Public bug reported:
Back In Time has some terrific advantages over other popular backup
solutions, particularly its scheduling options and snapshot viewer. The
one thing that keeps me from using it, however, is its lack of support
for encryption. Because I prefer to keep my backups on an extern
On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 01:06:57PM -, Bart de Koning wrote:
> Upstream we use gksu, it is changed to su-to-root in the ubuntu packages,
> however it seems to be a very neat solution for a common encountered
> problem.
> Are there any strong arguments not to switch upstream, eg what is the
> ava
Perhaps "Refresh view" is better because "Refresh snapshots" can still mean
to perform a new snapshot.
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Dan wrote:
> The button is there for people who start BIT before plugging-in the
> external drive. This button force to refresh the GUI.
> I agree, "Refresh snap
Hello Back In Time Team,
On 2009-12-07 13:30z (5 minutes ago), you uploaded a translation
template for back-in-time in Back In Time trunk in Launchpad.
The template has now been imported successfully.
Thank you,
The Launchpad team
___
Mailing list:
The button is there for people who start BIT before plugging-in the external
drive. This button force to refresh the GUI.
I agree, "Refresh snapshots" is a better name.
** Changed in: backintime
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
Update snapshot button causes confusion
https://bugs.la
Upstream we use gksu, it is changed to su-to-root in the ubuntu packages,
however it seems to be a very neat solution for a common encountered
problem.
Are there any strong arguments not to switch upstream, eg what is the
availability of su-to-root on other distributions, like Suse, or Fedora, or
i
Well it supports FAT32, that is not the problem. We state clearly though
that FAT32 does not support hardlinks, so BiT will use much more space on a
FAT32 drive than on Ext2/3/4 or NTFS. The 4 GB limit of FAT32 is another
characteristic of FAT32 why we think that it is not recommended to use as a
B
I agree, BIT should warn the user when it select to backup on a FAT32 drive
(max 4G per file and no hard-links).
A better option for a windows/linux filesystem is NTFS: is support bigger
files/drives and hard-links.
--
Backup ends when a file > 4gb should be saved on a FAT32 filesystem
https://
Public bug reported:
I'm running Ubuntu 9.10 / Back in Time 0.9.26.
When I select "Take Snapshot" a snapshot is generated as expected.
When I select "Update Snapshot" nothing happens even though I know
several tens of files have changed since the initial snapshot. I checked
the backup destinatio
We might have to change the name of the button, because I have seen this
question before: the update button is to update the GUI view, to update your
snapshots you have to push the take snapshot button.
Probably refresh is a better name
** Changed in: backintime
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: backintime
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
--
[enhancement] search
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/492730
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Back In
Time Team, which is subscribed to Back In Time.
Status in Back In Time: New
Bug description:
it wo
11 matches
Mail list logo
