Re: OSPF?

2017-05-22 Thread Israel G. Lugo
On 05/23/2017 01:07 AM, Jason Kopacko wrote: > Yes I sure do. That's great! :) > All I need at this point for OSPF is an output of a route table with > OSPF routes. I'll send you a sanitized route table off-list. Regards, Israel

Re: OSPF?

2017-05-22 Thread Jason Kopacko
Yes I sure do. All I need at this point for OSPF is an output of a route table with OSPF routes. Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Samsung Galaxy S5. On May 22, 2017 6:53 PM, "Israel G. Lugo" wrote: > Hello, > > Do you plan to release this web based interface to the public? > > I am attachi

Re: Bird Daemon Performance and usage information

2017-05-22 Thread Eloi Carbó Solé
Hello, Thank you very much to all of you that have shared some really useful presentations, it will help me not only to add more detail and supportive material but also giving me the opportunity to see some really interesting projects and deployments using Bird, I really appreciate it. Best regar

Re: OSPF?

2017-05-22 Thread Israel G. Lugo
Hello, Do you plan to release this web based interface to the public? I am attaching the output of running "birdc show protocols all" as root on a building aggregation router. It has a static route for a customer, a default sink, some glue protocols and an OSPF connection to the campus backbone.

OSPF?

2017-05-22 Thread Jason Kopacko
Is anyone using BIRD and peered with an OSPF device? If so, can you send me the sanitized output of this command? [ sudo birdc show protocols all ] I am building a web based interface to our current deployment and we are do not use OSPF, we are using BGP. I wanted to build my parsing so that it

VRF Support

2017-05-22 Thread Reji Varghese
Hello Team, Want to quickly check this. Do we have VRF support today in the BIRD stack? If not, is there a plan to add support for the same in the near future? Regards Reji Varghese

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Core changes to support SADR

2017-05-22 Thread Dean
On 05/22/2017 03:30 PM, Ondrej Zajicek wrote: @@ -231,6 +232,20 @@ fib_find(struct fib *f, const net_addr *a) case NET_ROA6: return FIB_FIND(f, a, roa6); case NET_FLOW4: return FIB_FIND(f, a, flow4); case NET_FLOW6: return FIB_FIND(f, a, flow6); + case NET_SADR_IP6: +{ + i

Re: [PATCH 2/4] Static protocol supports SADR

2017-05-22 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 02:17:43PM +0200, Dean wrote: > >You should add parsing of SADR networks to conf/confbase.Y together with > >other network types in net_ nonterminal symbol. That would add support > >of SADR to static procotol automatically. > > > >Also, SADR-based recursive routes seems lik

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Core changes to support SADR

2017-05-22 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 11:01:34PM +0200, Dean Luga wrote: > From: dean > > This patch adds a new network of type NET_SADR_IP6, including new > structures, constants, and switch cases for the new network type. > Some existing functions are duplicates to handle the new network > type, and netlink

Re: Bird Daemon Performance and usage information

2017-05-22 Thread Pierky
Hi, On 20 May 2017 at 17:08, Eloi Carbó Solé wrote: > is there any extra documents I could use as evidence of Bird's > performance/adoption rate or latest presentations to the public? - "Scaling BIRD Routeservers", by DE-CIX, October 2016: here you can find some benchmarks they run under some p

Re: [PATCH 2/4] Static protocol supports SADR

2017-05-22 Thread Dean
On 05/22/2017 01:57 PM, Ondrej Zajicek wrote: On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 11:01:35PM +0200, Dean Luga wrote: From: dean A new channel, sadr_ip6, is used for SADR both in the kernel and static protocols. In the static protocol, routes can be inserted with the following syntax: route from via "in

Re: [PATCH 2/4] Static protocol supports SADR

2017-05-22 Thread Ondrej Zajicek
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 11:01:35PM +0200, Dean Luga wrote: > From: dean > > A new channel, sadr_ip6, is used for SADR both in the kernel > and static protocols. In the static protocol, routes can be > inserted with the following syntax: > > route from via "interface" > route from recursive

Re: Source Address Dependent Routing patch

2017-05-22 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Dean writes: > On 05/22/2017 12:07 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: > >> Yes, they can. You can use two kernel protocols, one with the SADR >> channel and the other with ipv6. Both sets of routes are stored in >> the same kernel table. >> >> Ah, yes, but I meant inside Bird in this instance. C

Re: Source Address Dependent Routing patch

2017-05-22 Thread Dean
On 05/22/2017 12:36 PM, Dean wrote: On 05/22/2017 12:07 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: Yes, they can. You can use two kernel protocols, one with the SADR channel and the other with ipv6. Both sets of routes are stored in the same kernel table. Ah, yes, but I meant inside Bird in this instan

Re: Bird Daemon Performance and usage information

2017-05-22 Thread Aris Lambrianidis
Hi Eloi, This presentation is by now outdated, so its usefulness is limited, but it might be interesting if only for historic purposes: https://ams-ix.net/downloads/ams-ix-route-server-implementations-performance.pdf Kind regards, Aris Eloi Carbó Solé 20 May 2017 at 1

Re: Source Address Dependent Routing patch

2017-05-22 Thread Dean
On 05/22/2017 12:07 PM, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote: Yes, they can. You can use two kernel protocols, one with the SADR channel and the other with ipv6. Both sets of routes are stored in the same kernel table. Ah, yes, but I meant inside Bird in this instance. Can the bird 'struct fib' hold bo

Problem with BIRD importing routes from neighbor to master table

2017-05-22 Thread Lyubomir Millanov
Hello, I'm having this problem with BIRD refusing to import a specific route into the routing table. This is strange because this is the session with the neighbor is not new and all of his other prefixes work fine. This is a newly added prefix. What I see: bird> show route all 185.200.156.0/22

Re: Source Address Dependent Routing patch

2017-05-22 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Dean Luga writes: > On 22 May 2017 11:28, "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" wrote: > > Dean writes: > > > Hello, > > > > This is another try at extending the static and OSPFv3 protocols to > > support Source Address Dependent Routing (SADR), also called Source > > Specific Routing. This basically

Re: Source Address Dependent Routing patch

2017-05-22 Thread Dean Luga
On 22 May 2017 11:28, "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" wrote: Dean writes: > Hello, > > This is another try at extending the static and OSPFv3 protocols to > support Source Address Dependent Routing (SADR), also called Source > Specific Routing. This basically means that routing will take into > accoun

Re: Source Address Dependent Routing patch

2017-05-22 Thread Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
Dean writes: > Hello, > > This is another try at extending the static and OSPFv3 protocols to > support Source Address Dependent Routing (SADR), also called Source > Specific Routing. This basically means that routing will take into > account not only the destination address, but the source addre