On 22 May 2017 11:28, "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <t...@toke.dk> wrote:
Dean <dlug...@gmail.com> writes: > Hello, > > This is another try at extending the static and OSPFv3 protocols to > support Source Address Dependent Routing (SADR), also called Source > Specific Routing. This basically means that routing will take into > account not only the destination address, but the source address as > well. Nice work! After a quick look at this (I'll go through it in more detail later), it looks like I can use the core parts of this for Babel as well. :) It looks like a separate channel is needed for SADR routes; (right?) but can SADR and non-SADR ipv6 routes co-exist in the same FIB? -Token Yes, they can. You can use two kernel protocols, one with the SADR channel and the other with ipv6. Both sets of routes are stored in the same kernel table. But the kernel bug is still present. Using both types of routes in the same table gives undefined behavior. A hacky workaround would be to replace ::/0 sources with 2000::/3 in netlink, but it would reduce the set of accepted prefixes.
