On 05/22/2017 01:57 PM, Ondrej Zajicek wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 11:01:35PM +0200, Dean Luga wrote:
From: dean <dlug...@gmail.com>
A new channel, sadr_ip6, is used for SADR both in the kernel
and static protocols. In the static protocol, routes can be
inserted with the following syntax:
route <dst_prefix> from <src_prefix> via "interface"
route <dst_prefix> from <src_prefix> recursive <ip>
Hi
You should add parsing of SADR networks to conf/confbase.Y together with
other network types in net_ nonterminal symbol. That would add support
of SADR to static procotol automatically.
Also, SADR-based recursive routes seems like a whole new can of worms.
And we are currently rethinking recursive routes internally. Perhaps
you could postpone changes to hostentry and stick with SADR recursive
routes dependent on non-SADR IGP tables, which fits to the current
framework. Note that this was updated in 2.0-pre1 so that for other
network types than IP4/IP6, igp tables are of type IP4/IP6.
Ok. How do I go about this? Do I make the changes and submit all 4
patches again? Or another patch with the config fix and reverting the
recursive SADR routes?
