Re: Issues with Stub Zone

a record in /etc/hosts. Also the stub zone file updates correctly. I have tested static-stubs and they work as expected but stubs don't when recursion is enabled on the BIND server. Ben On 08/05/2019 17:02, Chris Buxton wrote: Remembering that a stub zone is a cache hint, more inform

Forwarders with static-stub

Hi, When I setup static-stub zones with the global forwarders options configured, BIND by design forwards the requests before using the stubs. What is the best way around this so the stubs and cache are consulted first? This is required for split-brain DNS. Thanks Regards Ben Lavender

Re: Change DNS records automatically when a link is DOWN

If you can craft the monitor for the link it could call nsupdate to make the change On Wed, Jun 5, 2019, 11:16 AM Roberto Carna wrote: > Dear people, I have two sites: > > - Main site with an Internet link and two BIND services (DNS1 y DNS2) and > a /28 block, and web and mail services supported

Re: Question about at zone transfer behaviour on slave

You are looking for the refresh timer in the SOA if you mean the timer for a slave to check the serial with the master. On Wed, Jun 5, 2019, 10:09 PM Techs-yama wrote: > Hi all, > > Have a question about at zone transfer behaviour on slave server. > > In case of slave zone configure and restarti

Static-stub server-addresses re-order

Hello, Quick question, if we have a number of these IPs that do not reply (timeout), would BIND re-order these like it would with forwarder IPs? Or would it fail if it used one that didn't reply? Thanks Regards Ben Lavender ___ Please visit

Re: Static-stub server-addresses re-order

Don't suppose anyone knows this do they? Thanks On Wed, 19 Jun 2019, 16:21 Ben Lavender, wrote: > Hello, > > Quick question, if we have a number of these IPs that do not reply > (timeout), would BIND re-order these like it would with forwarder IPs? Or > would it fail if it

Re: BIND 9.20.6: spurious recursive lookup failures after longish uptime

gt; domain, but apparently our logging does not catch those. What is your logging config like? Maybe post an extract of your logging{} block? Sometimes BIND is trying to say what is wrong, but the log config is throwing it away. -- Ben -- Any opinions expressed in this message are those o

Re: isc-bind service shutdown after update at 9.20.7-1.2.el8

ecStart tells systemd to clear the stock ExecStart declaration, rather than adding to it. And $OPTIONS is "-u bind -t /srv/dns" per /etc/default/named file. -- Ben -- Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author alone. All information is provided without warra

Re: Significant memory usage

ations-for-bind-9 https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-00769 https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-01123 -- Ben -- Any opinions expressed in this message are those of the author alone. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from

Forward First on Master Zone (bypass SOA)

any luck. Is there any way to accomplish what I'm trying to do? Thanks, Tal Ben-Eliezer ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

RE: Forward First on Master Zone (bypass SOA)

Hi Chris, this looks interesting, I'll do some testing and report back! Thank you, Tal -Original Message- From: Chris Buxton [mailto:cli...@buxtonfamily.us] Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2013 5:02 PM To: Ben-Eliezer, Tal (ITS) Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Forward Fir

RE: bind-users Digest, Vol 1485, Issue 1

nt-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed On 3/29/2013 6:12 PM, Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. wrote: > - Original Message - >> On Mar 28, 2013, at 12:28 PM, Ben-Eliezer, Tal (ITS) wrote: >> >>> I?ve spent hours researching a way to accomplish this without any >&

BIND 9.4.x and check-names

sdcs./A: bad owner name (check-names) default.log:12-Apr-2013 00:45:37.447 general: warning: zone /IN: gc._msdcs./A: bad owner name (check-names) Best Regards, Tal Ben-Eliezer ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mai

Re: BIND 9.4.x and check-names

d check-names Message-ID: <20130417155830.ga14...@fantomas.sk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed On 17.04.13 06:39, Ben-Eliezer, Tal (ITS) wrote: >Subject: BIND 9.4.x and check-names Isn't it time to upgrade? >I recently implemented a change in our DNS

bind caching data from additional section in responses

t. 292 NS ns1.example.com. 292 NS ns2.he.net. 292 NS ns3.he.net. [...] ; glue ns1.example.com.172791 A 192.0.2.1 ; glue [...] is my perception accurate? is bind c

Re: bind caching data from additional section in responses

On Oct 07, 2016, at 05.44, Tony Finch wrote: > > ben thielsen via bind-users wrote: >> >> zone "example.com" { >> type stub; >> masters { >> "example.com" ; >> }; >> }; >> >> maste

<    1   2   3