On Oct 07, 2016, at 05.44, Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at> wrote:
> 
> ben thielsen via bind-users <bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote:
>> 
>> zone "example.com" {
>>      type stub;
>>      masters {
>>              "example.com" ;
>>      };
>> };
>> 
>> masters "example.com" {
>>      192.168.81.50 ;
>> };
> 
> If you want a fixed set of master servers for a zone, use static-stub.

aha, this seems to have worked.

>> is my perception accurate?  is bind caching the data it got back in the
>> additional section, for a name outside of the queried zone?  if so, why?
> 
> See RFC 2181 section 5.4.1 on trustworthiness ranking of DNS data.
> 
> BIND needs to cache referrals in order to be able to find the servers for
> follow-up queries (including when it is completing the current query!).
> It doesn't pro-actively check the authoritative servers to get more
> trustworthy versions of the referral records.

thanks for taking the time to summarize this.  i sort of have mixed feelings, a 
little bit, about that degree of trust in additional data, but i get the 
rationale.

-ben
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to