Re: Static-stub zones and forwarding

2012-08-24 Thread Michael Hoskins (michoski)
-Original Message- From: Mark Picone Date: Thursday, August 23, 2012 10:45 PM To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" Subject: Static-stub zones and forwarding >Hi All, > >I am in the process of migrating all of our client facing resolver hosts >back to BIND (from unbound) and have hit a roadblo

Zone Transfer issue on BIND9

2012-08-24 Thread snoop
file "/etc/namedb/slave/DOMAIN01.eu.ext.zone"; masters { 10.0.0.15; }; }; zone "DOMAIN02.net" { type slave; file "/etc/namedb/slave/DOMAIN02.net.ext.zone"; masters { 10.0.0.15; };

Re: Zone Transfer issue on BIND9

2012-08-24 Thread Phil Mayers
On 24/08/12 12:09, sn...@email.it wrote: Hi there, I have an issue related to zone transfer which I couldn't fix. I've found a "presumable" fix googling a lot but it doesn't seem to work. You haven't said *how* it isn't working. Be specific. Note that the FAQ link you reference puts the "serve

RE: Zone Transfer issue on BIND9

2012-08-24 Thread Lightner, Jeff
You're putting the allow transfer on each zone? I don't think that's your issue but it seems odd to me. Here we do it at the view level. Also it appears you're using the same IP for at least two of your views - for view transfers to work properly here we setup virtual IPs on the DNS servers

RE: Zone Transfer issue on BIND9

2012-08-24 Thread snoop
con Email.it: http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: Offerte all inclusive in Romagna. Speciale Agosto da Euro 480,00 Speciale Settembre da Euro 295. Terzo letto Gratis e Quarto scontato al 50% Clicca qui: http://adv.email.it/cgi-bin/foclick.cgi?mid=12601&d=20120824 -- Caselle da 1GB, trasmett

Re: Zone Transfer issue on BIND9

2012-08-24 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, sn...@email.it wrote: > ***MASTER server (FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3 (i386)|| BIND 9.8.3-P2)*** > view "internal" { > match-clients { !key TSIG-KEY; internal; datacentre; }; ... > view "dmz" { > match-clients { !key TSIG-KEY; internal; datacentre; }; A client

Re: Zone Transfer issue on BIND9

2012-08-24 Thread snoop
nd-users > > > -- Caselle da 1GB, trasmetti allegati fino a 3GB e in piu' IMAP, POP3 e SMTP autenticato? GRATIS solo con Email.it: http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: Offerte all inclusive in Romagna. Speciale Agosto da Euro 480,00 Speciale Settembre da Euro 295. Terzo letto Gratis e Qua

Re: Zone Transfer issue on BIND9

2012-08-24 Thread snoop
-- Caselle da 1GB, trasmetti allegati fino a 3GB e in piu' IMAP, POP3 e SMTP autenticato? GRATIS solo con Email.it: http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: Offerte all inclusive in Romagna.Speciale Agosto da Euro 480,00 Speciale Settembre da Euro 295,00. Terzo letto Gratis e Quarto scontato al 50% Clic

Re: Zone Transfer issue on BIND9

2012-08-24 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, sn...@email.it wrote: > view "internal" { ... > zone "1.16.172.in-addr.arpa" IN { > type master; > file "/etc/namedb/master/1.16.172.in-addr.arpa.ext.zone"; Previous zone file names in this same view were called "int". Why the filenam

Re: Zone Transfer issue on BIND9

2012-08-24 Thread snoop
e only things that I've changed are the public IP addresses and the domain names which affect also file names and the TSIG name. -- Caselle da 1GB, trasmetti allegati fino a 3GB e in piu' IMAP, POP3 e SMTP autenticato? GRATIS solo con Email.it: http://www.email.it/f Sponsor: Offerte last

Re: How to validate SRV record?

2012-08-24 Thread Kevin Darcy
Fine, the validator would confirm that the SRV's owner name is compliant with RFC 6335, no more, no less. - Kevin On 8/23/2012 7:01 PM, Doug Barton wrote: On 8/23/2012 3:49 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote: Sorry, I meant to say that it's pretty clear that it *restricts* what a Service L

Re: How to validate SRV record?

2012-08-24 Thread Kevin Oberman
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote: > Fine, the validator would confirm that the SRV's owner name is compliant > with RFC 6335, no more, no less. You seem to completely ignore the idea of non-standard, locally defined services, but they really exist and are used. If you insist on