On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 8:38 PM, Kevin Darcy <k...@chrysler.com> wrote: > Fine, the validator would confirm that the SRV's owner name is compliant > with RFC 6335, no more, no less.
You seem to completely ignore the idea of non-standard, locally defined services, but they really exist and are used. If you insist on only registered services, BIND will no longer work for those and they are explicitly allowed by RFC2782 and people expect them to continue to work. RFC635 clearly states that service names SHOULD be registered with IANA, but any enterprise using a locally developed and quite possibly proprietary service is quite unlikely to register it or want to do so. After all, it would serve no purpose at all, even if the SRV records were used between enterprise facilities over the wider Internet. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: kob6...@gmail.com _______________________________________________ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
