Fine, the validator would confirm that the SRV's owner name is compliant
with RFC 6335, no more, no less.
- Kevin
On 8/23/2012 7:01 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 8/23/2012 3:49 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
Sorry, I meant to say that it's pretty clear that it *restricts* what a
Service Label may contain. It's even a "MUST".
Sure, but you're omitting the (typically unstated) part of the MUST, "a
compliant implementation." So it depends on the OP's purpose. Is it to
"validate" what will work on the wire, or to validate what is likely to
be accepted outside of their organization? There are a non-zero number
of special-purpose SRV records in use that aren't related to published
service names. Where do you draw the line?
Doug
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe
from this list
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
