Sunil Shetye writes:
Quoting from p...@mail.nsbeta.info's mail on Thu, Dec 30, 2010:
What's the difference between these two flags in the response of
dig?
< ;; flags: qr ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 0
ra : recursion available
The nameserver is ready to ask other n
Sunil Shetye writes:
Case 2: Lame Server Reply
===
$ dig +norecurse @a.iana-servers.net. example.org.
;; flags: qr ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;example.org. IN A
;; ANSWER SE
Quoting from p...@mail.nsbeta.info's mail on Thu, Dec 30, 2010:
> Where is the document for these flags?
> I google'd but got no correct result :)
http://www.tcpipguide.com/free/t_DNSMessageHeaderandQuestionSectionFormat.htm
--
Sunil Shetye.
___
bind-u
Dnia 2010-12-30 18:03 p...@mail.nsbeta.info napisał(a):
>Sunil Shetye writes:
>
>>
>> Case 2: Lame Server Reply
>>
>> ===
>> $ dig +norecurse @a.iana-servers.net. example.org.
>> ;; flags: qr ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2
$ dig www.cnn.com @202.96.128.166
; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2 <<>> www.cnn.com @202.96.128.166
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 65353
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUESTION SECTION:
;www.cnn.com.
Because it's contrary to itself.
You've specified norecurse, which means that if nameserver believes it has
authorative data it should return it, if it doesn't it should return a
referral (and no answer beside it).
But the server returns answer (which means it believes it has authorative
da
On 12/30/10 10:45, Torinthiel wrote:
Dnia 2010-12-30 18:03 p...@mail.nsbeta.info napisał(a):
Sunil Shetye writes:
Case 2: Lame Server Reply
===
$ dig +norecurse @a.iana-servers.net. example.org.
;; flags: qr ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWE
Dnia 2010-12-30 19:18 p...@mail.nsbeta.info napisał(a):
>Please see this dig:
>
>$ dig +norec dev.game.yy.com @202.96.128.166
>
>; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2 <<>> +norec dev.game.yy.com @202.96.128.166
>;; global options: printcmd
>;; Got answer:
>;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 31
Dnia 2010-12-30 11:45 Torinthiel napisał(a):
>Dnia 2010-12-30 18:03 p...@mail.nsbeta.info napisał(a):
>
>>Sunil Shetye writes:
>>
>>>
>>> Case 2: Lame Server Reply
>>>
>>> ===
>>> $ dig +norecurse @a.iana-servers.net. example.or
On 12/30/10 11:12, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
$ dig www.cnn.com @202.96.128.166
; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2 <<>> www.cnn.com @202.96.128.166
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 65353
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDI
2010/12/28 Dennis Clarke :
>
>>> trying to resolve www.microsoft.com or microsoft.com results in a
>>> "connection timed out; no servers could be reached"
>>
>> Well, for what it's worth - it's not just you having that issue. When
>> testing from home and from work I get the same.
>>
>
> works fine
2010/12/30 Lazy :
> 2010/12/28 Dennis Clarke :
>>
trying to resolve www.microsoft.com or microsoft.com results in a
"connection timed out; no servers could be reached"
>>>
>>> Well, for what it's worth - it's not just you having that issue. When
>>> testing from home and from work I get t
On 12/30/2010 6:12 AM, p...@mail.nsbeta.info wrote:
$ dig www.cnn.com @202.96.128.166
; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2 <<>> www.cnn.com @202.96.128.166
;; global options: printcmd
;; Got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 65353
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 6, AUTHORITY: 0, AD
Zitat von Lazy :
2010/12/30 Lazy :
2010/12/28 Dennis Clarke :
trying to resolve www.microsoft.com or microsoft.com results in a
"connection timed out; no servers could be reached"
Well, for what it's worth - it's not just you having that issue. When
testing from home and from work I get th
Le jeudi 30 décembre 2010 à 20:29 +0100, lst_ho...@kwsoft.de a écrit :
> Zitat von Lazy :
>
> > 2010/12/30 Lazy :
> >> 2010/12/28 Dennis Clarke :
> >>>
> > trying to resolve www.microsoft.com or microsoft.com results in a
> > "connection timed out; no servers could be reached"
>
> >>
2010/12/30 :
> Zitat von Lazy :
>
>> 2010/12/30 Lazy :
>>>
>>> 2010/12/28 Dennis Clarke :
>> trying to resolve www.microsoft.com or microsoft.com results in a
>> "connection timed out; no servers could be reached"
>
> Well, for what it's worth - it's not just you having that i
On 30 Dec 2010, at 19:56, Lazy wrote:
>
> qmail uses ANY so m$ is not getting any mail from us
This is several bugs in qmail. It is making the query in order to canonicalize
the domain in outgoing email, which it does not need to do according to the
current SMTP specs. It should be making an M
2010/12/30 Tony Finch :
> On 30 Dec 2010, at 19:56, Lazy wrote:
>>
>> qmail uses ANY so m$ is not getting any mail from us
>
> This is several bugs in qmail. It is making the query in order to
> canonicalize the domain in outgoing email, which it does not need to do
> according to the current SM
If qmail is open source then YOU can patch it to your heart's content
and might even want to fork the project so you're maintaining it for
others.
Expecting BIND to hold itself back or patch itself for 1998 standards is
a bit like expecting people that maintain websites to keep support for
Mosaic.
On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 22:42 +0100, Lazy wrote:
> 2010/12/30 Tony Finch :
> > On 30 Dec 2010, at 19:56, Lazy wrote:
> >>
> >> qmail uses ANY so m$ is not getting any mail from us
> >
> > This is several bugs in qmail. It is making the query in order to
> > canonicalize the domain in outgoing emai
On 12/30/10 3:04 PM, Lightner, Jeff wrote:
If qmail is open source then YOU can patch it to your heart's content
and might even want to fork the project so you're maintaining it for
others.
Expecting BIND to hold itself back or patch itself for 1998 standards is
a bit like expecting people that
Because the 2nd response also included Authority Section, the additional
data are the addresses of the authoritative servers.
Thanks.
But why the second has an "AUTHORITY SECTION" included? but the first
doesn't?
Regards.
___
bind-users maili
Hi,
Is it a right way to run rsync for bind's zone files replication?
If we have dozons of zones, each zone has more than one view, under this
case setup the master/slave with standard zone-traff is the hard way IMO.
Thanks.
___
bind-users mailing
I apologize in advance for my limited understanding of BIND. I know
just enough to have our primary and secondary running without any
problems, but I am needing to do something new. I searched this list
for anything about dynamically updating a zone, but to be honest, it
all seems over my
Hello *,
I am hosting on my 6 NameServers 200.000 Domains and now in the meantime
it becomes complicate because they are arround 230.000 files now
including sub domains.
There are currrently 18 TLs.
My Question is:
How do you handel such amount of files and where is the best
pla
I do this for my Laptops. They can pick up an address from the local
network (where ever I am visiting, Airports, Data Centers, friends, work
- etc) and then update the info back home on my own network.
Basics - when DHCPCD gets an IP from upstream - it uses nsupdate to send
this info to a dynamic
26 matches
Mail list logo
