On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 22:42 +0100, Lazy wrote: > 2010/12/30 Tony Finch <d...@dotat.at>: > > On 30 Dec 2010, at 19:56, Lazy <lazy...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> qmail uses ANY so m$ is not getting any mail from us > > > > This is several bugs in qmail. It is making the query in order to > > canonicalize the domain in outgoing email, which it does not need to do > > according to the current SMTP specs. It should be making an MX query (not > > CNAME as it originally did and not ANY as it has done since about 1998) in > > order to find out if the domain needs to be canonicalized. It also has an > > undersized DNS packet buffer and cannot cope with truncated replies, so > > even if ANY queries for microsoft.com worked, qmail could not handle the > > reply. > > > > Qmail is buggy and unmaintained and has been abandoned by its author. Best > > avoided. > > easy for you to say ;) > > there are still many more or less happy qmail users, maybe we need > just another patch ;) >
I'm sure there's plenty of winblundaz 9(5|8) users out there who want some 'moderness' as well. Bind works as required, qmail does not, never did, and never will. > Regards > > Lazy no, I wont say it, I wont, no matter how much I want too!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
