Dnia 2010-12-30 19:18 p...@mail.nsbeta.info napisał(a):
>Please see this dig: > >$ dig +norec dev.game.yy.com @202.96.128.166 > >; <<>> DiG 9.4.2-P2 <<>> +norec dev.game.yy.com @202.96.128.166 >;; global options: printcmd >;; Got answer: >;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 31949 >;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 > >;; QUESTION SECTION: >;dev.game.yy.com. IN A > >;; ANSWER SECTION: >dev.game.yy.com. 1800 IN A 202.104.186.179 > >;; Query time: 5 msec >;; SERVER: 202.96.128.166#53(202.96.128.166) >;; WHEN: Thu Dec 30 19:16:44 2010 >;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 49 > > >So, is 202.96.128.166 a lame server? There's something strange with this one. You've specified +norec on command line, but the query was sent with 'rd' - 'recursion desired' flag, as if you haven't given +norec. And with recursion giving answer is perfectly legal. If not for that flag, then yes, I'd consider it a lame response, although probably someone more knowledgeable than me should judge this. Regards, Torinthiel _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
