On 21.11.10 21:57, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
> I was wondering if it's possible to return a "catchall" A record for
> domains which bind can't resolve?
not without patches (I don't know about any).
> I'm able to configure a "catchall" bind configuration where bind would
> return the same A re
Casey Deccio deccio.net> writes:
>
> After a review of NSEC3 showed that this particular behavior is
> expected because org has been signed using NSEC3 with the opt-out bit
> set.
I'm afraid I'm getting a bit lost due to my real lack of understanding of the
details of DNSSEC. I wish I had the
On 11/22/2010 01:01 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 22/11/10 5:05 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 11/21/2010 21:58, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 22/11/10 7:12 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, CT wrote:
- BIND 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2
Really old, definitely needs upgrading.
That just
Dear Folks,
It's easy enough to flush an A or PTR record with rndc flushname
name. But how do you flush a TXT or SPF record? (I don't want to
flush the whole zone).
--
Nick Urbanik http://nicku.org ni...@nicku.org
GPG: 7FFA CDC7 5A77 0558 DC7A 790A 16DF EC5B BB9D 2C24 ID:
On 23/11/10 06:55 +1100, Nick Urbanik wrote:
Dear Folks,
It's easy enough to flush an A or PTR record with rndc flushname
name. But how do you flush a TXT or SPF record? (I don't want to
flush the whole zone).
Simple! Just rndc flushname domainname works.
--
Nick Urbanik http://
On Nov 22 2010, Nick Urbanik wrote:
Dear Folks,
It's easy enough to flush an A or PTR record with rndc flushname
name. But how do you flush a TXT or SPF record?
Exactly the same way.
(I don't want to flush the whole zone).
There isn't any "flush whole zone" function in BIND. "rndc flush"
Hello,
We are running bind-9.7.2-P2 with dnssec-validation enabled for our
internal nameservers, and our internal nameservers crashed at the time of
reload around 2-4pm EST, one the nameserver with dnssec debug log enabled
shows tons of 'deadlock error' for some of the sub-domains under .fr,
Thanks to both Stacey and Barry for the feedback. You've answered my question.
Sorry I didn't get back with you on this sooner!
Marty
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 10:01:13 +
From: stacey.marsh...@oracle.com
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: problem getting address record for google p
On 11/21/2010 3:57 PM, Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I was wondering if it's possible to return a "catchall" A record for
domains which bind can't resolve?
I'm able to configure a "catchall" bind configuration where bind would
return the same A record for all queries; but I'd rather it returns it
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 5:28 AM, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> Casey Deccio deccio.net> writes:
>>
>> After a review of NSEC3 showed that this particular behavior is
>> expected because org has been signed using NSEC3 with the opt-out bit
>> set.
>
> I'm afraid I'm getting a bit lost due to my real l
I was unclear.
I know that libbind is its own package.
It was spun off some time ago, and no work has been released
on it is since.
I was asking if perhaps there was something in the works
that is replacing it.
And the answer to that is, apparently, no.
Thanks
> -Original Message-
>
On 11/22/2010 13:57, Jack Tavares wrote:
And the answer to that is, apparently, no.
I don't speak for ISC so you should not take my statement(s) as relevant
to the future of what may or may not happen with libbind.
Meanwhile, is your question based on idle curiosity, or is there some
specif
Hello,
can I set @ to a cname type? like:
@ IN CNAME www.example.com.
Thanks.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
On 23.11.10 15:50, Tech W. wrote:
> can I set @ to a cname type? like:
>
> @ IN CNAME www.example.com.
Certainly not. for a domain you have you need SOA and NS records, and CNAME
is incompatible with both of them.
OF course you can do
$ORIGIN new.example.com.
@ IN CNAME www.exam
14 matches
Mail list logo
