On 11/22/2010 01:01 AM, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 22/11/10 5:05 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 11/21/2010 21:58, Ben McGinnes wrote:
On 22/11/10 7:12 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
On Thu, 18 Nov 2010, CT wrote:
- BIND 9.3.6-P1-RedHat-9.3.6-4.P1.el5_4.2
Really old, definitely needs upgrading.
That just means they're running RHEL 5 or CentOS 5. If they have a
support contract with Red Hat, they may not be able to upgrade
without forfeiting their support and/or certification. That
version will include back-ported security fixes.
I get that actually. However it doesn't change my recommendation.
Even with security patches BIND 9.3 is past EOL, and incapable of
doing modern DNSSEC.
Fair enough. Red Hat probably need to find a middle ground for proper
updates of certain essential packages, like BIND, while working within
their upgrade path. That, however, is a topic for another list.
Regards,
Ben
Yeah.. the "other guys" have to run RHEL..
Redhat only supports "their" version of bind..
I used to recompile SRC rpms.. until I went to the ISC class..
now I compile from source.. so so much simpler.. (once you have all the
permissions set)..
>> - BIND 9.7.1-P2
> Not the latest version, you should probably consider upgrading.
I haven't really read the change log yet... but most likely will
Charles
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
