Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption

Hello! I test patch, add to bind95/Makefile .if (${ARCH} == "amd64") ARCH= x86_64 .endif work/bind-9.5.0-P2/config.log uname -m = amd64 /usr/bin/uname -p = amd64 Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler ISC_ARCH_DIR='x86_32' build='x86_64-portbld-

Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption

Hi can you verify if you're using the newly installed named. did you configure your options to replace the base? can you give us: ldd /usr/sbin/named ldd /usr/local/sbin/named to my understanding, there should be no memory leak issue at all if you disable threads.. this post has always been

can't see nameserver externally

Hello, I noticed that one of our nameservers is no longer responding with the correct address externally. The server is ns-2.hosp.utmck.edu and is listed as a server in the registration record for utmck.edu. The address should be 165.6.6.27 but a dig/nslookup from an external site returns 165.6.

Setting rr dns to only return one record?

Greetings all. Is it possible to set up BIND in such a way that if there are multiple A-records for a specific host, instead of returning all of them in response to a request and only changing the order with every second request, the server only returns one A-record, and varies that A-record wit

Re: can't see nameserver externally

On Dec 9 2008, Davenport, Steve M wrote: I noticed that one of our nameservers is no longer responding with the correct address externally. The server is ns-2.hosp.utmck.edu and is listed as a server in the registration record for utmck.edu. The address should be 165.6.6.27 but a dig/nslookup f

Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption

At Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:05:27 +0300, Dmitry Rybin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I test patch, add to bind95/Makefile > .if (${ARCH} == "amd64") > ARCH= x86_64 > .endif Future versions of BIND9 will support amd64 in its configure script to workaround the FreeBSD port for amd64. Regarding

Re: Setting rr dns to only return one record?

At Tue, 09 Dec 2008 08:59:38 -0700, "Dustin Lovell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greetings all. Is it possible to set up BIND in such a way that if > there are multiple A-records for a specific host, instead of > returning all of them in response to a request and only changing the > order with eve

RE: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption

Hi Jinmei, Has anybody else tried this patch for you? I haven't had time to look into this at all. If nobody has tried this yet, I'll get around to it when I can and let you know the result. -Vinny > -Original Message- > From: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tues

Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption

At Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:26:25 -0500, Vinny Abello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Has anybody else tried this patch for you? I haven't had time to > look into this at all. If nobody has tried this yet, I'll get around > to it when I can and let you know the result. No one else other than by myself. I

RE: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption

> -Original Message- > From: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 3:38 PM > To: Vinny Abello > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption > > At Tue, 9 Dec 2008 15:26:25 -0500,

Re: Round robin DNS and only one record?

Dustin Lovell wrote: Certain browsers hitting our web application don't like having two A-records handed to them (I'm still in the process of figuring out why), Yeah, you really need to dig into that further, since we have *hundreds* of multi-A-record names, and we've never run into any browse

Re: can't see nameserver externally

Davenport, Steve M wrote: Hello, I noticed that one of our nameservers is no longer responding with the correct address externally. The server is ns-2.hosp.utmck.edu and is listed as a server in the registration record for utmck.edu. The address should be 165.6.6.27 but a dig/nslookup from