Hi Jinmei, Has anybody else tried this patch for you? I haven't had time to look into this at all. If nobody has tried this yet, I'll get around to it when I can and let you know the result.
-Vinny > -----Original Message----- > From: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 1:06 AM > To: Vinny Abello > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption > > At Tue, 2 Dec 2008 00:35:32 -0500, > Vinny Abello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > For what it's worth, I just want to contribute that I can > > confirm this behavior on my systems as well. On BIND 9.5.0-P2, > > From an off-list discussion, I found there was indeed memory leak in > the code of 9.5.0-P2 (so I was wrong in suspecting it might be the > FreeBSD thread library). > > Can you try the patched copied below to see whether it solves the > problem? > > Note: this leak was already fixed in 9.5.1rc1: > > 2435. [bug] Fixed an ACL memory leak affecting win32. > > while the change description seems to indicate it's win32 specific, > it can actually happen any build with threads and without atomic > operations. > > --- > JINMEI, Tatuya > Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. > > Index: acl.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /proj/cvs/prod/bind9/lib/dns/acl.c,v > retrieving revision 1.37.2.7 > diff -u -r1.37.2.7 acl.c > --- acl.c 29 Apr 2008 01:04:14 -0000 1.37.2.7 > +++ acl.c 1 Dec 2008 03:17:36 -0000 > @@ -217,6 +217,7 @@ > > /* Search radix. */ > result = isc_radix_search(acl->iptable->radix, &node, &pfx); > + isc_refcount_destroy(&pfx.refcount); > > /* Found a match. */ > if (result == ISC_R_SUCCESS && node != NULL) { > Index: iptable.c > =================================================================== > RCS file: /proj/cvs/prod/bind9/lib/dns/iptable.c,v > retrieving revision 1.5.46.3 > diff -u -r1.5.46.3 iptable.c > --- iptable.c 21 Jan 2008 21:02:24 -0000 1.5.46.3 > +++ iptable.c 1 Dec 2008 19:25:27 -0000 > @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ > family = bitlen ? pfx.family : AF_INET; > > result = isc_radix_insert(tab->radix, &node, NULL, &pfx); > + isc_refcount_destroy(&pfx.refcount); > > if (result != ISC_R_SUCCESS) > return(result); _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
