Hi
can you verify if you're using the newly installed named.
did you configure your options to replace the base?
can you give us:
ldd /usr/sbin/named
ldd /usr/local/sbin/named
to my understanding, there should be no memory leak issue at all if you disable
threads..
this post has always been directed to the concern of FreeBSD + amd64 platform +
FreeBSD port dns/bind95 (BIND 9.5.0-P2) + threading enabled
thanks!
--- On Wed, 12/10/08, Dmitry Rybin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Dmitry Rybin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption
> To: "Vinny Abello" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]>, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wednesday, December 10, 2008, 4:05 AM
> Hello!
>
> I test patch, add to bind95/Makefile
> .if (${ARCH} == "amd64")
> ARCH= x86_64
> .endif
>
> work/bind-9.5.0-P2/config.log
> uname -m = amd64
> /usr/bin/uname -p = amd64
> Target: amd64-undermydesk-freebsd
> Configured with: FreeBSD/amd64 system compiler
> ISC_ARCH_DIR='x86_32'
> build='x86_64-portbld-freebsd7.0'
> build_alias='x86_64-portbld-freebsd7.0'
> build_cpu='x86_64'
> host='x86_64-portbld-freebsd7.0'
> host_cpu='x86_64'
>
> I didn't find any affect, memory leak very quickly with
> threads support,
> and slowly without threads.
>
> FreeBSD xxx 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #0: Wed Jul 2
> 14:18:35 MSD
> 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/H1 amd64
>
>
> Vinny Abello wrote:
>
> >>> so does this memory leak only occur if
> >>> @ISC_ARCH_DIR@ is "noatomic" under
> FreeBSD amd64?
> >>> and not when its "x86_32" ?
> >> First off, note that I have no explicit evidence
> of memory leak. But
> >> *if there is indeed leak in the FreeBSD pthread
> library*, the key is
> >> "noatomic". With this configuration
> named will call pthread
> >> locks/unlocks much, much heavier, so the problem
> may be observable
> >> more clearly. named still uses pthread locks Even
> with x86_32, so it
> >> may just be leaking memory more slowly.
> >>
> >> Again, everything is just a guess and could be
> wrong. We should seek
> >> advice from someone who knows FreeBSD library
> well.
> >
> > Just out of curiosity, why in theory is this not seen
> in prior versions of BIND such as 9.4.2-P2 or 9.4.3 on the
> same FreeBSD 7.0 AMD64 platforms with threading enabled in
> BIND?
>
>
> --
> Рыбин Дмитрий
> Управление магистральной сети
> Отдел Информационных Систем
> Руководитель группы АВР
> Corbina Telecom
> Tel: +7(495) 728-4000
> _______________________________________________
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
