Re: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

2014-01-23 Thread Alan Clegg
On Jan 23, 2014, at 9:54 AM, Mike Hoskins (michoski) wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Thomas Schulz > Date: Thursday, January 23, 2014 at 9:50 AM > To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" > Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4 > >>> I just rememb

Re: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

2014-01-23 Thread Mike Hoskins (michoski)
-Original Message- From: Thomas Schulz Date: Thursday, January 23, 2014 at 9:50 AM To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4 >> I just remembered there was also the change to the db file >> having a default raw format on s

RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

2014-01-23 Thread Thomas Schulz
> I just remembered there was also the change to the db file > having a default raw format on slaves unless specified. Interesting. I did not notice that when it happened, but now that I look, I see that my slaves indeed have raw format files. Apparently the switch over did not require me to do an

Re: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

2014-01-22 Thread Mike Hoskins (michoski)
-Original Message- From: Mike Bernhardt Date: Wednesday, January 22, 2014 at 3:25 PM To: "'Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng.'" , "bind-users@lists.isc.org" Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4 >Thanks for that. I just remembered there was also the change

RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

2014-01-22 Thread Mike Bernhardt
: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4 On 01/16/14 16:39, Mike Hoskins (michoski) wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Mike Bernhardt > Date: Thursday, January 16, 2014 4:09 PM > To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" > Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4 > >>

Re: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

2014-01-21 Thread Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng.
On 01/16/14 16:39, Mike Hoskins (michoski) wrote: > -Original Message- > From: Mike Bernhardt > Date: Thursday, January 16, 2014 4:09 PM > To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" > Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4 > >> Sorry for the double post, but

Re: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

2014-01-16 Thread Mike Hoskins (michoski)
-Original Message- From: Mike Bernhardt Date: Thursday, January 16, 2014 4:09 PM To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4 >Sorry for the double post, but I forgot to ask this: >And if it is indeed enabled regardless of my RFC1918 ranges,

RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

2014-01-16 Thread Mike Bernhardt
cing server which of course has no RFC1918, I would leave it to the default setting? -Original Message- From: Mike Bernhardt [mailto:bernha...@bart.gov] Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 1:03 PM To: 'bind-users@lists.isc.org' Subject: RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4 Am I correct in

RE: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

2014-01-16 Thread Mike Bernhardt
t: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 11:47 AM To: bind-users@lists.isc.org Subject: Re: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4 IIRC, The main change I ran into when I upgraded to 9.9.2-P1 (from 9.7.6-P4) was the change in default for empty-zones. All are enabled by default, including RFC1918 ranges whether you have a

Re: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

2014-01-14 Thread Mike Hoskins (michoski)
somewhere first...always good to confirm for your exact configuration. -Original Message- From: "", "P.Eng." Organization: Kansas State University - ITS/Enterprise Server Technologies Date: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 2:46 PM To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org" Subj

Re: Upgrading from 9.8.3 to 9.9.4

2014-01-14 Thread Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng.
IIRC, The main change I ran into when I upgraded to 9.9.2-P1 (from 9.7.6-P4) was the change in default for empty-zones. All are enabled by default, including RFC1918 ranges whether you have any defined or not. On 01/14/14 12:16, Mike Bernhardt wrote: > Is there anything I need to know regarding c