At Tue, 20 Jan 2009 02:16:00 -0600,
"Frank Bulk - iName.com" wrote:
> My bad. Let me restate the request -- that all the information available
> via XML in the HTML statistics channel is also printed out when issuing
> "rndc stats".
It's the opposite: all the information printed out when issuin
f Of Barry Margolin
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 9:47 PM
To: comp-protocols-dns-b...@moderators.individual.net
Subject: Re: SERVFAIL issues
In article ,
"Frank Bulk" wrote:
> Sorry for not being more clear. It's my understanding that "rndc stats"
> dumps only
Administrator's Reference Manual for BIND.
>
> Regards,
>
> Frank
>
> -Original Message-
> From: JINMEI Tatuya / ...@l@C#:H(B [mailto:jinmei_tat...@isc.org]
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 1:38 PM
> To: Frank Bulk
> Cc: bind-us...@isc.org
> Subj
d-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: SERVFAIL issues
At Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:37:25 -0600,
"Frank Bulk" wrote:
> Thanks for the info -- is there a way that there can be feature parity, at
> least in terms of stats reported, between ARM and "rndc stats"?
I don't understa
At Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:37:25 -0600,
"Frank Bulk" wrote:
> Thanks for the info -- is there a way that there can be feature parity, at
> least in terms of stats reported, between ARM and "rndc stats"?
I don't understand the question...what do you mean by 'feature parity
between ARM and "rndc stats
M
To: frnk...@iname.com
Cc: 'Fr34k'; bind-us...@isc.org
Subject: Re: SERVFAIL issues
At Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:24:28 -0600,
"Frank Bulk - iName.com" wrote:
> Yes, I read that last night before posting. I changed it to "256M". Is
> there a way using rndc to see i
>Frank
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Fr34k [mailto:freaknet...@yahoo.com]
>Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 8:45 AM
>To: frnk...@iname.com; bind-users@lists.isc.org
>Subject: Re: SERVFAIL issues
>
>Hello,
>
>Has the "max-cache-size" setting in named.conf been c
for about 6000 broadband customers and is an authoritative DNS server for
100+ domains.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Fr34k [mailto:freaknet...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 8:45 AM
To: frnk...@iname.com; bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject: Re: SERVFAIL issues
Hello,
Has the &q
Hello,
Has the "max-cache-size" setting in named.conf been considered?
If not, note that in early releases of 9.5.x max-cache-size is 32M by default
instead of unlimited as in 9.4.x
>From the CHANGES file with the bind-9.5.0-P2 source:
""max-cache-size" defaults to 32M"
Using:
max-cache-size 0
> Is this intermittent SERVFAIL issue resolved in 9.5.1-P1?
9.5.1 has many improvements that solve various SERVFAIL issues seen in the
9.5.0-P1/P2 code and includes /dev/poll, kqueue, or epoll on supported
systems.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-user
10 matches
Mail list logo
