Sorry for not being more clear. It's my understanding that "rndc stats" dumps only a subset of what ARM provides.
Regards, Frank -----Original Message----- From: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 [mailto:jinmei_tat...@isc.org] Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 1:38 PM To: Frank Bulk Cc: bind-us...@isc.org Subject: Re: SERVFAIL issues At Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:37:25 -0600, "Frank Bulk" <frnk...@iname.com> wrote: > Thanks for the info -- is there a way that there can be feature parity, at > least in terms of stats reported, between ARM and "rndc stats"? I don't understand the question...what do you mean by 'feature parity between ARM and "rndc stats"'? Anyway, the fact is that the ARM describes both the output of 'rndc stats' and the output from a HTML statistics channel (to some extent). In general, what is described in the ARM should be consistent with the actual behavior. Of course, there can always be a discrepancy between a manual (ARM) and the software behavior as long as it's done by a human. Please file a bug report if you find one. --- JINMEI, Tatuya Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
