Thank you Tony and Joseph,
I think you have explained this well, and most importantly, exposed the
underlying issues.
Best regards,
Gary
On 7/14/2014 06:27, Tony Finch wrote:
Gary Wallis wrote:
What are the drawbacks, if any, of running only master name servers for the
set of authoritativ
Gary Wallis wrote:
>
> What are the drawbacks, if any, of running only master name servers for the
> set of authoritative NSs?
That depends entirely on how you are replicating the zone data.
The DNS's own replication (AXFR, IXFR, NOTIFY, TSIG) is pretty hard to
beat: it is fast, secure, and cope
On 2014-07-13 12:11, Gary Wallis wrote:
Hello,
What are the drawbacks, if any, of running only master name servers
for the set of authoritative NSs?
For example given:
[root@rc37 unxsVZ]# dig latimes.com NS +short
dns1.tribune.com.
dns2.tribune.com.
dns4.tribune.com.
dns3.tribune.com.
Where a
> dns2.tribune.com.
> dns4.tribune.com.
> dns3.tribune.com.
>
> Where all 4 dnsN servers are in fact masters (this is just a hypothetical,
> the NS above are most likely secondary
> servers)
why do you start the same thread again?
---- Original-Nachricht --------
Betreff: Re:
-Original Message-
From: Gary Wallis
Date: Sunday, July 13, 2014 at 12:11 PM
To: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
Subject: Public facing authoritative NS all masters
>Hello,
>
>What are the drawbacks, if any, of running only master name servers for
>the set of aut
Hello,
What are the drawbacks, if any, of running only master name servers for
the set of authoritative NSs?
For example given:
[root@rc37 unxsVZ]# dig latimes.com NS +short
dns1.tribune.com.
dns2.tribune.com.
dns4.tribune.com.
dns3.tribune.com.
Where all 4 dnsN servers are in fact masters (
Please don't reply to a message on the list and change the subject line.
Doing so causes your new topic to show "under" the previous one for
those using mail readers that thread properly, and may cause your
message to be missed altogether if someone has blocked that thread.
Instead, save the l
Am 12.07.2014 16:11, schrieb Gary Wallis:
> DNS experts,
>
> What are the drawbacks, if any, of running only master name servers for the
> set of authoritative NSs?
>
> For example given:
>
> [root@rc37 unxsVZ]# dig latimes.com NS +short
> dns1.tribune.com.
> dns2.tribune.com.
> dns4.tribune.
DNS experts,
What are the drawbacks, if any, of running only master name servers for
the set of authoritative NSs?
For example given:
[root@rc37 unxsVZ]# dig latimes.com NS +short
dns1.tribune.com.
dns2.tribune.com.
dns4.tribune.com.
dns3.tribune.com.
Where all 4 dnsN servers are in fact mas
9 matches
Mail list logo
