On 2014-07-13 12:11, Gary Wallis wrote:
Hello,

What are the drawbacks, if any, of running only master name servers
for the set of authoritative NSs?

For example given:

[root@rc37 unxsVZ]# dig latimes.com NS +short
dns1.tribune.com.
dns2.tribune.com.
dns4.tribune.com.
dns3.tribune.com.

Where all 4 dnsN servers are in fact masters (this is just a
hypothetical, the NS above are most likely secondary servers)
...

If you think about it, it is not the servers themselves that are master or slave. For each zone, it is the copy of that zone that is considered a master copy on that server, or a copy slaved to the copy on another server. And this can be different for each zone served on those servers.

There should in fact be only one master copy that you change, for each zone, and the other name servers somehow get an identical copy of that master copy.

Whether all four of the visible authoritative name servers are configured to have "master" in their internal configurations, saying to use the copy of the zone found on disk, or "slave", saying to use the DNS standard method of slaving the server's copy to a copy of that zone found on another server, is in fact invisible to users and irrelevant to them. What is important is that all servers declared as authoritative for that one zone DO serve that zone, and respond with the same information. All four could be configured as having a "master" copy of a zone and get it by other means from a hidden master copy, or all four could be configured as having "slave" copies slaved to, again, a hidden master copy; or some combination (e.g., 4's copy is slaved to 3's copy which is slaved to 2's copy, and both 1 and 2 are declared as having master copies and get them via SCP from a hidden master, just to get complicated).

Now, what was the reason you asked this question? Is there an underlying question behind that?

Joseph Yao
_______________________________________________
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to