Re: Can an NS point to a CNAME

2010-08-13 Thread Phil Mayers
On 13/08/10 14:14, Dave Sparro wrote: On 8/13/2010 6:08 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: Still puzzled that bind didn't seem to log anything. I will have a trawl through the source I think; I'm sure it must be my logging config. I don't know if I'm on the right path, but were you logging lame delegati

Re: Can an NS point to a CNAME

2010-08-13 Thread Dave Sparro
On 8/13/2010 6:08 AM, Phil Mayers wrote: Still puzzled that bind didn't seem to log anything. I will have a trawl through the source I think; I'm sure it must be my logging config. I don't know if I'm on the right path, but were you logging lame delegations? -- Dave ___

Re: Can an NS point to a CNAME

2010-08-13 Thread Phil Mayers
On 13/08/10 08:49, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: On 12.08.10 17:07, Phil Mayers wrote: Thanks, but perhaps I should be more specific about what I'm asking: Is it still the case that *Bind* will not follow a delegation where an NS record points at a CNAME? In any event, as has been pointed out

Re: Can an NS point to a CNAME

2010-08-13 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 12.08.10 17:07, Phil Mayers wrote: > Thanks, but perhaps I should be more specific about what I'm asking: > > Is it still the case that *Bind* will not follow a delegation where an > NS record points at a CNAME? > > In any event, as has been pointed out to me, the zone is broken - I have > c

Re: Can an NS point to a CNAME

2010-08-12 Thread Phil Mayers
On 12/08/10 16:34, Yohann Lepage wrote: 2010/8/12 Phil Mayers: Is this still the case (that NS->CNAME is invalid)? http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2181.txt 10.3. MX and NS records The domain name used as the value of a NS resource record, or part of the value of a MX resource record

Re: Can an NS point to a CNAME

2010-08-12 Thread Yohann Lepage
2010/8/12 Phil Mayers : > Is this still the case (that NS->CNAME is invalid)? http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2181.txt 10.3. MX and NS records The domain name used as the value of a NS resource record, or part of the value of a MX resource record must not be an alias. Not only is the

Re: Can an NS point to a CNAME

2010-08-12 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 12.08.10 12:02, Phil Mayers wrote: > We've had a report this morning that a user can't resolve: > > 71.225.219.134.in-addr.arpa PTR > > ...I think this is because the parent zone NS records point to CNAMEs. I > can see references to (much) older versions of bind not following such > delegati

Can an NS point to a CNAME

2010-08-12 Thread Phil Mayers
All, We've had a report this morning that a user can't resolve: 71.225.219.134.in-addr.arpa PTR ...I think this is because the parent zone NS records point to CNAMEs. I can see references to (much) older versions of bind not following such delegations, but I'm not getting anything logged at t