2010/8/12 Phil Mayers <p.may...@imperial.ac.uk>: > Is this still the case (that NS->CNAME is invalid)?
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2181.txt 10.3. MX and NS records The domain name used as the value of a NS resource record, or part of the value of a MX resource record must not be an alias. Not only is the specification clear on this point, but using an alias in either of these positions neither works as well as might be hoped, nor well fulfills the ambition that may have led to this approach. This domain name must have as its value one or more address records. Currently those will be A records, however in the future other record types giving addressing information may be acceptable. It can also have other RRs, *but never a CNAME RR*. -- Yohann www.2xyo.info _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
