On 12.08.10 17:07, Phil Mayers wrote: > Thanks, but perhaps I should be more specific about what I'm asking: > > Is it still the case that *Bind* will not follow a delegation where an > NS record points at a CNAME? > > In any event, as has been pointed out to me, the zone is broken - I have > contacted the hostmaster - but I was curious that Bind did not appear to > be following the delegation *and* did not appear to be logging an error > (which may be my logging configuration).
I have just tested on 4 of our nameservers (their real ips behind loadbalancer) and two of them timed out. It seems that direct delegation of rhbnc.ac.uk is/was broken too. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Enter any 12-digit prime number to continue. _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
