Do you think that we can get rid of CNAME too?
regards
Klaus
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Ondřej Surý
> Gesendet: Montag, 9. August 2021 19:19
> An: Klaus Darilion
> Cc: Mark Andrews ; bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Betreff: Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR
>
> No, and there’s no str
Does every application that uses gethostbyname have a benefit of HTTPS/SVCB?
That is what I meant.
regards
Klaus
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Mark Andrews
> Gesendet: Montag, 9. August 2021 15:55
> An: Klaus Darilion
> Cc: Evan Hunt ; Gaurav Kansal ; bind-
> us...@lists.isc.org
>
> On 09.08.21 13:55, Klaus Darilion via bind-users wrote:
> >But honestly SVCB will not solve the ANAME problem. I will take years
> > until all resolvers/client would support SVCB whereas ANAME would be
> > implemented in the authoritative name server
>
> resolving on authoritative server could
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: bind-users Im Auftrag von Evan
> Hunt
> Gesendet: Samstag, 7. August 2021 20:21
> An: Gaurav Kansal
> Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org
> Betreff: Re: Does BIND supports ANAME RR
>
> On Sat, Aug 07, 2021 at 11:05:51PM +0530, Gaurav Kansal wrote:
> > I need t
4 matches
Mail list logo