RE: Case For Microsoft DNS v. BIND 9 - Or Best Practices ForCoexisting

2009-02-08 Thread Vinny Abello
> -Original Message- > From: Danny Mayer [mailto:ma...@gis.net] > Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 9:57 PM > To: Vinny Abello > Cc: Baird, Josh; bind-users@lists.isc.org > Subject: Re: Case For Microsoft DNS v. BIND 9 - Or Best Practices > ForCoexisting &g

RE: Case For Microsoft DNS v. BIND 9 - Or Best Practices ForCoexisting

2009-02-08 Thread Vinny Abello
> -Original Message- > From: Danny Mayer [mailto:ma...@gis.net] > Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2009 8:32 PM > To: Vinny Abello > Cc: Baird, Josh; bind-users@lists.isc.org > Subject: Re: Case For Microsoft DNS v. BIND 9 - Or Best Practices > ForCoexisting > > Vin

RE: Case For Microsoft DNS v. BIND 9 - Or Best Practices For Coexisting

2009-02-08 Thread Vinny Abello
> -Original Message- > From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org [mailto:bind-users- > boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Danny Mayer > Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2009 2:29 PM > To: wiskbr...@hotmail.com > Cc: bind-users@lists.isc.org > Subject: Re: Case For Microsoft DNS v. BIND 9 - Or Bes

RE: Case For Microsoft DNS v. BIND 9 - Or Best Practices ForCoexisting

2009-02-08 Thread Vinny Abello
> Baird, Josh wrote: > > Actually, yes, if you have dynamic DNS registration enabled on the > client/host and server, an 'A' record will automatically be created in > the AD zone. > > > > It needs to be registered in the domain first. Otherwise any system > could mascarade as another system. > >

RE: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption

2008-12-31 Thread Vinny Abello
> -Original Message- > From: Danny Mayer [mailto:ma...@gis.net] > Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2009 12:05 AM > To: jinmei_tat...@isc.org > Cc: Vinny Abello; do...@freebsd.org; bind-us...@isc.org > Subject: Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption > > JINMEI Tat

RE: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption

2008-12-09 Thread Vinny Abello
> -Original Message- > From: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2008 3:38 PM > To: Vinny Abello > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption > > At Tue, 9

RE: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption

2008-12-09 Thread Vinny Abello
ROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2008 1:06 AM > To: Vinny Abello > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption > > At Tue, 2 Dec 2008 00:35:32 -0500, > Vinny Abello <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

RE: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption

2008-12-01 Thread Vinny Abello
xactly? -Vinny > -Original Message- > From: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 4:09 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Vinny Abello; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption > >

RE: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption

2008-11-28 Thread Vinny Abello
> -Original Message- > From: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 4:09 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Vinny Abello; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption > > At Thu, 27