> -----Original Message----- > From: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 28, 2008 4:09 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Vinny Abello; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: dnsperf and BIND memory consumption > > At Thu, 27 Nov 2008 23:35:30 -0800 (PST), > ivan jr sy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > so does this memory leak only occur if > > @ISC_ARCH_DIR@ is "noatomic" under FreeBSD amd64? > > and not when its "x86_32" ? > > First off, note that I have no explicit evidence of memory leak. But > *if there is indeed leak in the FreeBSD pthread library*, the key is > "noatomic". With this configuration named will call pthread > locks/unlocks much, much heavier, so the problem may be observable > more clearly. named still uses pthread locks Even with x86_32, so it > may just be leaking memory more slowly. > > Again, everything is just a guess and could be wrong. We should seek > advice from someone who knows FreeBSD library well.
Just out of curiosity, why in theory is this not seen in prior versions of BIND such as 9.4.2-P2 or 9.4.3 on the same FreeBSD 7.0 AMD64 platforms with threading enabled in BIND? -Vinny _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
