Re: Trying simple NS delegation for a subdomain * I cannot get it to load/work

2025-08-27 Thread Robert McDonald (Bob)
. Bob -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https

Re: DNS hiccups

2025-04-16 Thread Bob McDonald
Its glb in the name. On further inspection this is DNS that's on the frontend of Azure. (probably Microsoft based.) Good luck! On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 10:05 AM Bob McDonald wrote: > FORMER doesn't mean the environment being queried is necessarily broken. > Queries sent to t

Re: DNS hiccups

2025-04-16 Thread Bob McDonald
ement on their end that will resolve the issue. They might even reveal their architecture and software vendor/version. HTH, Bob -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscrip

RE: Custom DNS Filtering Plugin in BIND 9

2025-03-19 Thread Bob McDonald
Maybe I'm not understanding all the nuances of the stated goal but doesn't RPZ handle this? Bob Sent from my Google Pixel 8a phone. -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with pa

Re: Named-checkzone stops silently

2025-01-04 Thread bob prohaska
; > > On 5 Jan 2025, at 07:21, f...@www.zefox.net wrote: > > > > I'm setting up a new, non-recursive, authoritative secondary > > nameserver using FreeBSD 12.2 and bind9.18.32. It works to the typo 14.2 Ap

Re: Named-checkzone stops silently

2025-01-04 Thread bob prohaska
#x27;s 14.2 Apologies for the noise! bob prohasaka -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-use

Re: Does an RPZ "A" record prevent a lookup?

2025-01-03 Thread Bob Harold
Yes, RPZ looks up first, and only replaces it if the lookup returns a value. There is an option to skip that, but then an attacker can more easily detect that you are using RPZ to block them. Search for descriptions online. -- Bob Harold DNS and DHCP Hostmaster - UMNet Information and

Re: query failed (SERVFAIL) and query failed (failure)

2024-12-23 Thread Bob Harold
I don't think it is your problem. gandi.net is having trouble. https://dnsviz.net/d/mail.gandi.net/dnssec/ -- Bob Harold On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 7:24 AM Barry Scott wrote: > I have been using named-chroot on Fedora 40 for a long time without issue > on version bind-9.18.28-2.

Re: `dig -x ...` and RFC 2317 Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA Delegation

2024-12-19 Thread Bob Harold
to use beside dig et al.? > > I typically use something like: dig +noall +ans -x 192.0.2.1 | awk '$4 == "PTR" {print $5;exit}' That returns only the first PTR record if there are more than one. -- Bob Harold > -- > Grant. . . . > unix || die > -- > -

Re: Undelegating a Signed Subdomain

2024-12-10 Thread Bob Harold
he TTL's everywhere during the transition, but not everyone honors that - one of the public DNS providers limits TTLs to something like the 30 second to 8 hour range, if I remember correctly. -- Bob Harold On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 1:48 AM Ondřej Surý wrote: > Chris, that depends whether

Re: Question about DNSSEC

2024-11-01 Thread Bob McDonald
Thanks guys! As usual, you've taught me an invaluable lesson. Regards, Bob On Fri, Nov 1, 2024 at 11:42 AM Evan McKinney wrote: > Even with a CNAME record, the delv command will validate each step of the > resolution. You can use the +vtrace option to see each validation and >

Re: Question about DNSSEC

2024-11-01 Thread Bob McDonald
Sorry, I get the DO and AD flags confused. I see now that DIG is telling me that somewhere in the chain there is an entry that is not validated. I was doing everything manually. And yes, I saw that DELV runs the chain. Thanks again, Bob -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind

Re: Question about DNSSEC

2024-11-01 Thread Bob McDonald
rs.gov.edgekey.net. 75 IN CNAME e127382.dscna.akamaiedge.net . e127382.dscna.akamaiedge.net. 20 IN A 23.208.28.6 e127382.dscna.akamaiedge.net. 20 IN A 23.208.28.30 Regards, Bob -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds

Question about DNSSEC

2024-10-31 Thread Bob McDonald
as it's a US gov host. Please advise. Regards, Bob -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bin

Re: DNSSEC with views and shared zone files

2024-10-18 Thread Bob Harold
do > this? > I am using "in-view" so I only have one copy of the zone in memory and on disk. In the 'oncampus' view: zone "umich.edu" { type slave; file "oncampus/edu.umich"; masters { "DNS123"; }; }; And in the other view:

Re: Lookup failures

2024-09-13 Thread Bob McDonald
that works also) If you need my named.conf, just ask. Sometimes it helps to compare notes. Are you running on a router or some other device? Are you running RPZ? Bob -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software

Re: bind918 malfunction?

2024-09-06 Thread Bob Harold
.telekom.net. telekom.de. 3600 IN NS dns1.telekom.de. telekom.de. 3600 IN NS dns2.telekom.de. telekom.de. 3600 IN NS pns.dtag.de. This is the type of NS record 'tree' that I also had, that caused me problems. -- Bob Harold On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 3:27 PM Ondřej Surý wrote: > Ok, so

Re: bind918 malfunction?

2024-09-06 Thread Bob Harold
ertificate, LetEncrypt using Unbound was verifying every NS record and sometimes gave up, with an error message "exceeded the maximum nameserver nxdomains" even though there were no 'nxdomains' in the log. I simplified my NS records and the problem went away. -- Bob Harold O

RE: statistics-channels

2024-08-12 Thread Bob McDonald
Its libxml2 and libxml2-devel Please refer to the following for information. https://kb.isc.org/docs/aa-00769 Regards, Bob -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions

Re: Answers for www.dnssec-failed.org with dnssec-validation auto;

2024-04-18 Thread Bob McDonald
Thanks Mark. It's right there in the log. Bob -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-

Re: Answers for www.dnssec-failed.org with dnssec-validation auto;

2024-04-17 Thread Bob McDonald
Would this be true for FreeBSD as well? I also have a bind 9.18.24 instance running on freeBSD and it seems to be ok. Bob > The crypto policy stuff ultimately creates and maintains files in /etc/crypto-policy/backends, which has a list of acceptable or not-acceptable crypto settings. >

Re: Answers for www.dnssec-failed.org with dnssec-validation auto; (John Thurston)

2024-04-17 Thread Bob McDonald
works but it's REALLY slow. Dig shows both the address of the server providing the answer and the amount of time it took for the resolution. That MAY provide some clues as to what's going on. I suspect this is an issue with bind 9.18.24. I can't say for sure. HTH, Bob Sent from m

Re: Intent and implementation of dig's +crypto option

2023-09-22 Thread Bob Harold
nk that dig should be adjusted to suppress cryptographic > material from other records such as TLSA, SSHFP, CDNSKEY, CDS, etc, and > the man page updated to reflect this? > > Regards, > Anand Buddhdev > -- > > Just my opinion, but I would like it to apply to all crypto

Re: Forwarders working differently on bind9.8 & bind9.11

2023-09-19 Thread Bob Harold
e or more forwarders, and they are queried in turn until the list is exhausted or an answer is found." So the first one will get all the traffic, the second is just a backup to be used if the first fails. If you expect that to do load balancing, it will not. Try a real load balancer, or &

Re: Facing issues while resolving only one record

2023-08-30 Thread Bob McDonald
This is why I try to read this list every day... Thanks Mark. I need to go back to RTFM (or read the man page) -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at htt

Re: Facing issues while resolving only one record

2023-08-30 Thread Bob McDonald
the associated DNSSEC records (if they exist). It doesn't affect validation. You must make the options change indicated by Greg Choules in his previous post to disable DNSSEC validation for a specific domain. Sorry if this is redundant or very rudimentary. Bob -- Visit https://lists.is

Does DNSSEC increased packet size reach end computers?

2023-04-11 Thread Bob Harold
DNS Authoritative servers? (Granted, the actual answer size to the client could be large enough to cause fall-back to TCP, but that is not because of DNSSEC.) -- Bob Harold -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this

RE: PPA for Raspbian distros

2023-03-25 Thread Bob McDonald
tware versions. e.g. FreeBSD offers 9.16, 9.18, and 9.19. They are also a little quicker to offer packages for new releases. YMMV, Bob -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Co

DNS DDoS protection

2023-02-24 Thread Bob Harold
Before answering this question, can you tell me the proper place where I should be asking this question? "We are researching DDoS protection, including DNS. What companies or products or methods should I be looking at?" -- Bob Harold -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/

Sanity Check

2023-02-17 Thread Bob McDonald
at will go away eventually. Any comments are welcome. Thanks, Bob named.conf: acl rfc1918-nets { 10.0.0.0/8; 172.16.0.0/12; 192.168.0.0/16; }; include "/usr/local/etc/namedb/rndc.key"; controls { inet 127.0.0.1 port 953 allow { 127.0.0.1; } keys { rndc-

Re: Incremental transfers generate complete zone reloading

2023-01-16 Thread Bob McDonald
Mea Culpa. Apparently RPZ IS the issue here. I learn something new every time I read this list. My apologies for the waste of bandwidth. Bob On Mon, Jan 16, 2023 at 9:02 AM Bob McDonald wrote: > This is just conjecture but I'll take a stab at this problem. > > First, the fact

RE: Incremental transfers generate complete zone reloading

2023-01-16 Thread Bob McDonald
hought and testing. The ultimate value depends on the volume of updates being generated. Hope that helps, Bob -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact u

Re: managed-keys vs trust-anchors

2023-01-04 Thread Bob McDonald
Thanks Evan and Ondrej. I'll let the folks at FreeBSD know also. Their bind packages still include that file. Bob On Wed, Jan 4, 2023, 14:59 Evan Hunt wrote: > On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 07:33:46AM -0500, Bob McDonald wrote: > > I've upgraded to bind 9.16.36. > > >

managed-keys vs trust-anchors

2023-01-02 Thread Bob McDonald
tion needs to be a bit more clear on this. Would it be helpful to have a version of the bind.keys file for bind 9.16 and above? Regards, Bob -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support sub

Re: PowerDNS secondary servers receive empty SOA response for particular zone.

2022-11-18 Thread Bob McDonald
also look at minimal-responses. Look at the structure of your DNS environment. Bob -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for

Re: dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33

2022-10-27 Thread Bob McDonald
Are the zones cern.ch and spectrum-lb.cern.ch on the same authoritative sDNS server? -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ fo

RE: dig +norecurse behaviour changed with 9.16.33

2022-10-26 Thread Bob McDonald
For both versions of bind, please submit the actual dig command and the complete results received. That will make diagnosing this issue MUCH easier. Regards, Bob -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software

Re: Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers

2022-10-18 Thread Bob McDonald
nd further, the classification of unknown gets automatically assigned to those clients combining in through GUEST WiFi (e.g. cell phones, ipads, etc.). Most organizations with a NAC layer in place have procedures to allow unknown clients temporary access at some level (e.g. vendors, etc.). HTH, Bob

Re: Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers

2022-10-15 Thread Bob McDonald
;t get hung up on it. Thank you all for the information. You've provided answers to my questions and have renewed my faith in geekdom. If anyone is still confused, I'd be glad to discuss this offline until we have a final solution. Then we can publish if necessary. Bob -- Visit

Re: Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers

2022-10-15 Thread Bob McDonald
o seek the wisdom of those on the list that have more experience or different experience than myself. Hopefully, I can gain from that wisdom and we can provide a kind environment where those less educated feel mentored. Bob -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from

Question About Internal Recursive Resolvers

2022-10-14 Thread Bob McDonald
tures such as RPZ, etc. Regards, Bob -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information. bind-users mailing list

Re: Proxy requests but filter out IPv4 address

2022-08-19 Thread Bob Harold
RPZ should be able to do that. Read up on RPZ in the BIND manual, and search online for more info. -- Bob Harold On Fri, Aug 19, 2022 at 2:56 AM Matthias Fechner wrote: > Dear all, > > I'm not sure if bind can do this, but let me explain what I would like > to do. > >

Re: RE: DNSSEC adoption

2022-08-03 Thread Bob Harold
will cause an increase in DNS traffic, and I don't know how much of an increase, but the 24-48 hour TTL of the DS record is the real down-side of DNSSEC, and why it is taking me so long to try to develop a bullet-proof process before signing my zones. -- Bob Harold University of Michigan O

Re: BIND9 TSIG from Windows Server 2016 DNS Server Zone

2022-05-27 Thread Bob Harold
e meantime, >> considering the recent >> surge of cyber attacks since the recent war started, and our country >> voted support for the >> defending party. >> >> Frankly, I am not in deep with Microsoft DNS, and I guess there can be >> some tweaking with &

Re: bugs for cname can not be working properly with bind 9.11.4

2022-05-25 Thread Bob McDonald
glance at the zone with dig, it looks as though the domain wasn't reloaded. Also, it looks like NS2 doesn't responf. Bob -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Con

Re: Determining Which Authoritative Sever to Use

2022-05-16 Thread Bob McDonald
in an internal environment. Again, my personal opinion is that it needlessly complicates the architecture of the environment and adds unnecessary cost. However, my experience with internal environments is with DDI appliances and they would offer any necessary backup requirements for a DNS zone. YMMV

Re: Determining Which Authoritative Sever to Use

2022-05-12 Thread Bob Harold
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 4:34 PM Grant Taylor via bind-users < bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote: > On 5/11/22 2:19 PM, Bob Harold wrote: > > Not sure who set it up, but my DHCP servers have for some zones: > > > > zone x.y.z.in-addr.arpa > > { > > primar

Re: Determining Which Authoritative Sever to Use

2022-05-11 Thread Bob Harold
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 1:50 PM Grant Taylor via bind-users < bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote: > On 5/11/22 11:24 AM, Bob McDonald wrote: > > It would seem that using an anycast cloud name (An anycast cloud > > of the NS device IPs) for the MNAME might provide the same leve

Determining Which Authoritative Sever to Use

2022-05-11 Thread Bob McDonald
g signed updates. Anyway, I've been looking at this for the last decade. I'm sure I'll discover more along the way. Bob -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscri

Re: Determining Which Authoritative Sever to Use (Bob McDonald)

2022-05-08 Thread Bob McDonald
ents in Asia being sent to authoritative only servers in South Amer. Bob -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more info

Determining Which Authoritative Sever to Use

2022-05-07 Thread Bob McDonald
only zones are defined on the caching servers via stub zones. My question is this; how do the recursive servers determine from the information in the stub zone which name server to query? And, is that the closest (network wise)? Do I need to put anycast into the mix? TTFN, Bob -- Visit https

Re: Supporting LOC RR's

2022-05-01 Thread Bob Harold
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 9:39 AM Bjørn Mork wrote: > Timothe Litt writes: > > > Anyhow, it's not clear exactly what problem you're asking LOC (or > > anything) to solve. > > Which problems do LOC solve? > > I remember adding LOC records for fun?() in the previous millennium when > RFC 1876 was fr

Re: Merging DNS servers

2022-04-26 Thread Bob Harold
ed to copy the journal files. If there are any other secondary servers (and you almost always want more than just the master), then change those to pull from the new server, and make sure that is working, before starting the steps you listed. -- Bob Harold -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/ma

Re: AA flag

2022-02-27 Thread Bob McDonald
I'm guessing that the zone files hosted on the new DNS servers still contain NS records pointing to the old DNS servers. Based on your post, that's my guess. Bob -- Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of thi

Re: Ask for automated KSK roll with DS checking

2021-04-15 Thread Bob Harold
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 12:44 PM Tony Finch wrote: > Matthijs Mekking wrote: > > On 15-04-2021 16:35, Bob Harold wrote: > > > > > > If BIND holds both the child and parent zone, will it add the DS record > > > at the correct time? Or do I still need to

Re: Ask for automated KSK roll with DS checking

2021-04-15 Thread Bob Harold
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 8:50 AM Bob Harold wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:57 AM Matthijs Mekking wrote: > >> >> >> On 14-04-2021 22:30, Greg Rivers via bind-users wrote: >> > On Wednesday, 14 April 2021 15:00:38 CDT Bob Harold wrote: >> >>

Re: Ask for automated KSK roll with DS checking

2021-04-15 Thread Bob Harold
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 2:57 AM Matthijs Mekking wrote: > > > On 14-04-2021 22:30, Greg Rivers via bind-users wrote: > > On Wednesday, 14 April 2021 15:00:38 CDT Bob Harold wrote: > >> Does anyone have an automated KSK roll process, that checks for the DS > >> re

Ask for automated KSK roll with DS checking

2021-04-14 Thread Bob Harold
EC if some other process does not update the DS record at the right time. That's too big a risk for me, the process needs to check the DS record before completing the KSK roll. Surely someone has done this. I would rather not reinvent the wheel. But I have searched and not found anything yet.

RE: replication time for dynamic records from primary to secondary servers

2021-04-02 Thread Bob McDonald
Is there an entry in your server options similar to this? notify-delay nn; Regards, Bob ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support

Re: Local resolution first and then public resolution for "google.com" domain (Roberto Carna)

2021-03-31 Thread Bob McDonald
You could use RPZ for the entry "www.google.com" and then the rest of the domain would resolve from the internet. Regards, Bob ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the d

Re: Options for named startup docker

2021-02-03 Thread Bob Harold
Pv4 only" Perhaps you want "-6" to use IPv6 only ? -- Bob Harold > > Normally you can do this via the file /etc/default/named (In the options > variable). Unfortunately, this file is ignored. I also tried it with the > "Environment" parameter in docker-comp

Re: How can I launch a private Internet DNS server?

2020-11-05 Thread Bob Harold
/etc/resolv.conf or the "DNS servers" seen in windows client settings, will only be used by the client if the first server does not respond. For that, you can use a public resolver like Google 8.8.8.8 as the second choice for your users. -- Bob Harold

Re: Malformed transaction errors

2020-10-19 Thread Bob McDonald
When you talk about "putting the .jnl file aside" what are you doing? Stopping named THEN deleting the .jnl file? Using rndc sync -clean ? In the case of the rndc command, you don't need to cycle named. What user is named running as? Are the directory permissions for the directory housing the .jn

Re: forwarders used in order or based on RTT ?

2020-10-16 Thread Bob Harold
That is certainly not obvious. How do I request improving the manual? "in turn" would seem to imply "in order", and the order would logically be the order I listed them. -- Bob Harold DNS and DHCP Hostmaster - UMNet Information and Technology Services (ITS) rharo...@umic

forwarders used in order or based on RTT ?

2020-10-16 Thread Bob Harold
based algorithm" So which is correct? And did it change at some point? -- Bob Harold DNS and DHCP Hostmaster - UMNet Information and Technology Services (ITS) rharo...@umich.edu 734-512-7038 ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/li

Re: bind 9.16.7 Odd query error (Borja Marcos)

2020-10-01 Thread Bob McDonald
My config took the following combination before it would work: max-recursion-depth 20; max-recursion-queries 275; I'm running both IPv4 and IPv6. Regards, Bob On Thu, Oct 1, 2020 at 2:37 AM Borja Marcos wrote: > > > > On 30 Sep 2020, at 22:34, Mark Andrews

Re: bind 9.16.7 Odd query error (Borja Marcos)

2020-09-30 Thread Bob McDonald
second time, it resolves. Almost looks like some sort of priming issue. YMMV, Bob ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscripti

RE: "minimal-any" configuration query

2020-09-08 Thread Bob McDonald
Without seeing your configuration, I can only suggest trying the minimal-responses option. Regards, Bob ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with

Re: A And Cname-record

2020-06-18 Thread Bob McDonald
.com. remtest IN CNAME temp001.example.com. Both examples are not allowed under the RFCs. Bob ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subsc

BIND log format Splunk regex

2020-05-26 Thread Bob Harold
I am told from my Splunk experts that the vendor supplied Splunk app for isc-bind matches the BIND 9.8 version used in RHEL6, but not the BIND 9.11 version using in RHEL7. I have a mix now. Does anyone have a REGEX for 9.11, or better yet, a regex that matches both formats? -- Bob Harold

re: How to disable recursion on ONE domain? (Bind-9.11.14)

2020-05-15 Thread Bob McDonald
Would adding the following to the zone config work? forwarders {}; Regards, Bob ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list ISC funds the development of this software with paid support

Re: How to disable recursion on ONE domain? (Bind-9.11.14)

2020-05-15 Thread Bob Harold
ype static-stub; > server-names { >"10.n.n.n"; >"10.n.n.m"; > }; >}; > }; > > This ALWAYS gives a SERVFAIL though regardless of whether the 10.n.n.n > addresses are reachable or not... > "server-names" must

Re: TSIG DDNS and windows clients

2020-05-13 Thread Bob Harold
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 3:49 PM Grant Taylor via bind-users < bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote: > On 5/13/20 6:29 AM, Bob Harold wrote: > > Your ACL looks right. I think Ben has the key - Windows uses GSS-TSIG, > > not regular TSIG. Not sure how or if that can be solved. &g

Re: TSIG DDNS and windows clients

2020-05-13 Thread Bob Harold
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 3:20 AM Pete Fry wrote: > Bob > thanks for the reply and the correction ( the acl dones't have a ! it was > a cut and paste error when i was trying to remove some information. > > the TSIG works when from other linux machine via nsupdate etc, how

Re: What is the proper way to delegate to a private / hidden sub-domain?

2020-05-06 Thread Bob Harold
and the other > anycast instance being internal private accessible. > > I don't see another way to delegate the same zone to different (sets of) > name servers without using anycast. Hence my email to the list asking > if anyone had any suggestions. > > > > --

Re: Question About Recursion In A Split Horizon Setup

2020-04-17 Thread Bob Harold
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 12:45 PM Tim Daneliuk wrote: > On 4/17/20 10:17 AM, julien soula wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 09:56:21AM -0500, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > >> On 4/17/20 9:50 AM, Bob Harold wrote: > >>> > >>> Agree, that's odd, and not what

Re: Question About Recursion In A Split Horizon Setup

2020-04-17 Thread Bob Harold
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 11:03 AM Konstantin Stefanov wrote: > On 17.04.2020 17:56, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > > On 4/17/20 9:50 AM, Bob Harold wrote: > >> > >> Agree, that's odd, and not what the man page says. Any chance that > there is some other DNS helper ru

Re: Question About Recursion In A Split Horizon Setup

2020-04-17 Thread Bob Harold
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 10:34 AM Tim Daneliuk wrote: > On 4/17/20 7:26 AM, Bob Harold wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 7:17 PM Tim Daneliuk <mailto:tun...@tundraware.com>> wrote: > > > > We have split horizon setup and enable our internal and t

Re: Question About Recursion In A Split Horizon Setup

2020-04-17 Thread Bob Harold
http://www.tundraware.com/PGP/ Is 127.0.0.1 in the 'trustedhosts' list? Are you telling 'dig' what server to use - dig @127.0.0.1 What servers are listed in /etc/resolv.conf? Do they resolve the reverse zones? Are local queries hitting the right 'view'

Re: DHCPD - BIND DDNS: dnssec-keygen hmac-md5 removed

2020-04-13 Thread Bob Harold
I would suggest: tsig-keygen your-key-name It does not need any options, the defaults are fine. -- Bob Harold On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 7:52 PM moo can via bind-users < bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote: > Hello, > > For educational purpose I need to setup an DDNS be

Re: Machine friendly alternative to nsupdate

2020-04-01 Thread Bob Harold
don't see where that handles updates. -- Bob Harold On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 9:39 AM Ondřej Surý wrote: > I would recommend dnspython as a start. The API is very non-Python, > but once you get hang of it, it’s not that bad. > > Ondrej > -- > Ondřej Surý > ond...@is

Re: Localhost view is not working for me

2020-03-30 Thread Bob Harold
ique names just to be sure which queries you are looking at. That's the best that I can suggest. -- Bob Harold On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 1:07 PM Marc Chamberlin via bind-users < bind-users@lists.isc.org> wrote: > Hello - I am running the Bind server > > > named -v > BIND

Re: How to get random subset of large rrset (30+ IPs for round robin)?

2020-03-20 Thread Bob Harold
nfo/bind-users > > > > -- > I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad > idea in the first place. > This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing > regret at having chosen thos

Re: bind9 memory leak with TreeMemTotal, and TotalUse stat seems fictional

2020-02-28 Thread Bob Harold
ary. -- Bob Harold On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 3:23 PM Alistair Bayley < alistair.bay...@kordia.co.nz> wrote: > Hello, > > I didn't get any response to this. Is there some documentation that I > haven't yet found that explains what these measurements mean? Has anyone >

Re: NS failover as opposed to A record failover

2020-02-26 Thread Bob Harold
t; > Scott, To directly give an opinion on your last question - client applications can often be slow to recover from failed connections, so updating the A records in the zone is a good idea - best to use nsupdate, do not edit zone file and reload. DNS Recursive resolvers should failover in secon

Re: Weird behaviour in wildcard CNAME - is this feature or bug? Can it be changed?

2020-02-11 Thread Bob Harold
.A 141.211.7.25 itd.umich.edu. A 141.211.7.25 *.itd.umich.edu.A 141.211.7.25 dns1.itd.umich.edu. A 192.12.80.214 -- Bob Harold On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 11:16 AM Petr Bena wrote: > Oh, that explains it, I did

Re: "overlay" views

2020-01-20 Thread Bob Harold
s different in each view: This zone is same in all views: zone example.com host1.example.com IN A 10.0.0.4 host2.example.com IN A 10.1.1.7 router.example.com CNAME router.splitview.example.com Then in one view: zone splitview.example.com router.splitview.example.com IN A 10.0.0.1 And the other view: zone splitvie

Re: What is wrong in the view matching below

2019-12-05 Thread Bob Harold
gt; > > Looks like the file lan.master.nixcraft.com has no data. > > > >> > >> Dec 05 17:51:54 sataradnsVM1 named[4038]: zone > >> internal.nixcraft.com\032/IN/internal: > has 0 SOA records > >> Dec 05 17:51:54 sataradnsVM1 named[4038]: zone > >&

Re: Internal CNAME in RPZ

2019-10-24 Thread Bob Harold
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 9:20 AM Andrey Geyn wrote: > Hi, Bob, thank you for response! > > What if I want to make following configuration (as an example): > > domain.comA10.10.10.10 > *.domain.com CNAMEdomain.com > > I don't want to write 10.10.10.10

Re: Internal CNAME in RPZ

2019-10-24 Thread Bob Harold
arate. Do you want cname.domain.com to point to 10.10.10.10? Then use an A record to 10.10.10.10. Do you want cname.domain.com to point to some real domain name (probably a name you control, like a walled garden, or error page)? Then CNAME to that real name. -- Bob Harold > > In this

re: Delegation not working from slave.

2019-10-02 Thread Bob McDonald
e for sub.example.com. on the main DNS server?) And does the zone file on the main have a glue record for dynsub.example.org.? Regards, Bob ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing

RE: Intermittent ServFail for FreeBSD.org names? (Havard Eidnes)

2019-09-16 Thread Bob McDonald
What does your request show when you include a +nodnssec switch on the dig? -Bob ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org

RE: nsupdate reject

2019-05-20 Thread Bob McDonald
The most obvious thing is to look at the zone and see if that key is included in an allow-update statement for the zone. Bob ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind

Re: dns latency

2019-04-12 Thread Bob Harold
418174157 > 20190411143657 26550 comcast.net. > YegwZlzjBoJ+b9nWTHwRZQbce619UcOVdo6FUPG056Sod4MEchv/GCHu > 7BpREAUm0CBoE4qbipTiS47wIk7QJYzz10B78wRgMGNwMTUXQ571YRyq > P0I3I0Dzag28j607walJOZms3lAXDzSnyvv9wocaH2MJ7Z3j68Qf5pKh YpM= > > ;; Received 227 bytes from 69.252.250.103#53(dns101.comc

Re: allow-update in global options (was Re: bind and certbot with dns-challenge)

2019-04-04 Thread Bob Harold
y to everything included in that scope, unless overridden." Why have exceptions to this? This seems like expected behavior, and will allow for simpler configurations in some cases. No one is forced to use this, it is optional, but often convenient. -- Bob Harold _

Re: allow-update in global options (was Re: bind and certbot with dns-challenge)

2019-03-22 Thread Bob Harold
- > Grant. . . . > unix || die > I use: named-checkconf -p > named.conf.out which I think is close enough, except for the comments. You just need to know that view-level settings are at the end of the view, not where you might expect. It makes for a very lot of text to read through, but

Re: allow-update in global options (was Re: bind and certbot with dns-challenge)

2019-03-18 Thread Bob Harold
on as simple as possible. And it should be possible to override any setting at a lower level, for the exceptions. It would be even better if I could 'group' zones and set configurations on the group. Repeating the same configuration thousands of times seems like a waste. I

Re: Advice for DNS reverse zones

2019-02-06 Thread Bob Harold
of records can be split off into its own 2.10.in-addr.arpa. An if a /24 gets really busy, you can split it out 5.1.10.in-addr.arpa There is no need to create all 256 /16's or all the /24's, just create them as needed. If having different sizes is too confusing, I suggest all /16'

Re: Selective forwarding?

2019-01-29 Thread Bob Harold
+ 2~3 days depending on the situation. > > A "week" is a minimum of 10 days, because 5 works days plus two weekends > in 9 days. > I also assume that either the Friday before their vacation week, or the Monday after, might be a holiday, so I use 11 days. :) -- Bob

Re: RPZ question autoritative/recursive servers

2019-01-22 Thread Bob Harold
on > these forward only servers ? > > Any thoughts on this ? > > Thank you > The RPZ function only runs on the Recursive DNS servers. The RPZ zone could be mastered on an Authoritative server, but it should not be visible to the publ

  1   2   3   >