Yes, this message arrived in my Inbox 44 minutes after it was sent.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+frnkblk=iname@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+frnkblk=iname@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of
Warren Kumari
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 4:59 PM
To: Warren Kumar
Yes, this message arrived in my Inbox 44 minutes after it was sent.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-bounces+frnkblk=iname@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces+frnkblk=iname@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of
Warren Kumari
Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 4:59 PM
To: Warren Kumar
In message , John Wobus write
s:
> What problems do sites have that deploy both multiple views and
> DNSSEC?
Sign all views. You can decide whether to use the same keying
material or use differing keying material. If you use differing
keying material you will need to distribute it. Different k
Does anyone else find the bind-users list to be very slow?
webster.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) Tue, 31 May 2011 19:48:30 + ->
webster.isc.org (webster.isc.org) Tue, 31 May 2011 20:52:09 +
Or is it just me seeing this?
W
On May 31, 2011, at 4:17 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
> On M
On May 31, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> On 5/31/2011 2:38 PM, Supersonic wrote:
>> I have a BIND 9.8.0-P2 server instance running on a production server.
>
> Doing what, exactly? Resolving internal names only? Resolving Internet names?
> Acting as an authoritative server for internal
On 05/31/11 20:38, Supersonic wrote:
> I have a BIND 9.8.0-P2 server instance running on a production server.
> My firewall is showing repeated attempts by named.exe to connect to IP
> addresses in foreign countries on ports , 6667 and 6669 - common IRC
> ports used by worms/trojans/zombies. Ch
> I have a BIND 9.8.0-P2 server instance running on a production server. My
> firewall is showing repeated attempts by named.exe to connect to IP
> addresses in foreign countries on ports , 6667 and 6669 - common IRC
> ports used by worms/trojans/zombies.
Sounds like you're running an IRC bot.
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 02:38:13PM -0400,
Supersonic wrote
a message of 38 lines which said:
> My firewall is showing repeated attempts by named.exe to connect to
> IP addresses in foreign countries on ports , 6667 and 6669
Not enough information to decide. For instance, what was the sour
On 5/31/2011 2:38 PM, Supersonic wrote:
I have a BIND 9.8.0-P2 server instance running on a production server.
Doing what, exactly? Resolving internal names only? Resolving Internet
names? Acting as an authoritative server for internal clients? Internet
clients? Some combination of the above?
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:38:13AM -0700, Supersonic wrote:
> I have a BIND 9.8.0-P2 server instance running on a production server. My
> firewall is showing repeated attempts by named.exe to connect to IP addresses
> in foreign countries on ports , 6667 and 6669 - common IRC ports used by
> wo
What problems do sites have that deploy both multiple views and
DNSSEC?
I read the "Split-View DNSSEC Operation Practices" draft, which
outlines a number of set-ups, generally citing disadvantages in the
area of administration, troubleshooting, and added complexity. But
it says these set-ups are
I have a BIND 9.8.0-P2 server instance running on a production server. My
firewall is showing repeated attempts by named.exe to connect to IP
addresses in foreign countries on ports , 6667 and 6669 - common IRC
ports used by worms/trojans/zombies. Checking my named.exe file, it shows
that it is
On Tuesday 31 May 2011 02:25, the following was written:
> > Split DNS is when you have 2 DNS servers, one internal and the other
> > external. Internal server serves the clients internally and the External
> > services the people on the Internet. This setup is very easy as both
> > server ho
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 06:14:25PM +0530,
babu dheen wrote
a message of 83 lines which said:
> please note that i am not going to host my website in DNS server
You said the opposite before:
> I am not sure why i do need to pay money to my ISP for hosting my
> website on my company DNS serve
On 31/05/11 09:28, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
This problem could be avoided by providing the same data, but differently
sorted, correct?
Not really. Client side sorting may take place (e.g. to comply with RFC
3484 policies in calls to getaddrinfo) and destroy any server-side sorting.
___
yep that works. thanks Dave. interestingly, 0/0 also works - thought
that might catch IPv6 as well, but a look at the rfc tells me the
correct syntax for 'any IPv6 host' is ::/0
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:54 PM, David Forrest wrote:
> On Tue, 31 May 2011, Dennis Perisa wrote:
>
>> Hello community
On Tue, 31 May 2011, Dennis Perisa wrote:
Hello community,
I have a requirement to configure BIND 9.7.3 to allow queries from any
IPv4 address and only a specific IPv6 prefix.
The allow-query statement takes an address match list as argument, but
I'm not sure how I can specify 'any IPv4 host'
Hello community,
I have a requirement to configure BIND 9.7.3 to allow queries from any
IPv4 address and only a specific IPv6 prefix.
The allow-query statement takes an address match list as argument, but
I'm not sure how I can specify 'any IPv4 host' without having to use
the 'any' keyword (whic
Robert you are great. You got it when i required. Thanks for sharing the
informatino. Will go through it and update all.
Keep it up.
Regards
Babu
--- On Tue, 31/5/11, Robert Spangler wrote:
From: Robert Spangler
Subject: Re: Split DNS Configuration in BIND
To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
Dat
> In message <4de43e3e.2040...@chrysler.com>, Kevin Darcy writes:
> > Normally I'd defer to your vastly greater knowledge and experience in
> > DNSSEC, but here in the U.S. we have a saying "I'm from Missouri", which
> > is a roundabout way of expressing "show me" ("Show Me" being the
> > unoffi
> > Would it be convenient to try 9.8.1b1? It has a fix that may address
> > this problem.
On 30.05.11 18:31, Evan Hunt wrote:
> I should add that I don't recommend using 9.8.1b1 in a production
> environemnt because of a known security flaw. But it might be
> informative to test with it and see
21 matches
Mail list logo
