Does anyone else find the bind-users list to be very slow?

webster.isc.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) Tue, 31 May 2011 19:48:30 +0000 ->  
webster.isc.org (webster.isc.org) Tue, 31 May 2011 20:52:09 +0000 

Or is it just me seeing this?

W


On May 31, 2011, at 4:17 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:

> 
> On May 31, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Kevin Darcy wrote:
> 
>> On 5/31/2011 2:38 PM, Supersonic wrote:
>>> I have a BIND 9.8.0-P2 server instance running on a production server.
>> 
>> Doing what, exactly? Resolving internal names only? Resolving Internet 
>> names? Acting as an authoritative server for internal clients? Internet 
>> clients? Some combination of the above?
>> 
>>> My firewall is showing repeated attempts by named.exe to connect to IP 
>>> addresses in foreign countries on ports 6666, 6667 and 6669 - common IRC 
>>> ports used by worms/trojans/zombies. Checking my named.exe file, it shows 
>>> that it is unchanged from the installation source. Is this connection 
>>> normal? Should I be allowing it?
>>> 
>> TCP connections or UDP packets?
>> 
>> If you're serving authoritative data to Internet clients, then my guess is 
>> your firewall simply isn't "stateful" enough to realize that these are 
>> responses to DNS queries that originally came in from Internet clients using 
>> those port numbers. Just because they are "common IRC ports used by 
>> worms/trojans/zombies" doesn't preclude them from also being chosen at 
>> random as the source ports of incoming queries to your nameserver. Responses 
>> go back to the same port from which the query was received.
> 
> 
> Can you make a distribution of ports and see if it contacts other port 
> numbers with approximately the same frequency? I'm guessing this is just the 
> FW / IDS being "helpful"....
> 
> W
> 
>> 
>> If they're outgoing TCP connections, I'd be worried. Offhand, I can't think 
>> of any legitimate reason why named would be trying to TCP-connect to any 
>> port other than 53.
>> 
>>                                                                              
>>                                                                          - 
>> Kevin
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> bind-users mailing list
>> bind-users@lists.isc.org
>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users@lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
> 

_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to