> > Would it be convenient to try 9.8.1b1? It has a fix that may address > > this problem.
On 30.05.11 18:31, Evan Hunt wrote: > I should add that I don't recommend using 9.8.1b1 in a production > environemnt because of a known security flaw. But it might be > informative to test with it and see whether it addresses the > CNAME problem, and if so you can deploy 9.8.1 in a few weeks. unfortunately, this is a very production environment, so I've had to downgrade to 9.7.3p1 :( I'm not sure if I can test this somewhere. Do you think that I'll have to downgrade on auth-only servers? -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Christian Science Programming: "Let God Debug It!". _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
