I`m facing kind of a challenge. At the moment we have BIND and windows DNS
within our corporate network.
I would like to get rid of windows DNS and switch completely over to BIND, but
since DNS is so intertwined with AD this is not an option since it probably
introduces more problems then it so
In article ,
"Laws, Peter C." wrote:
> Understood, but what I'm asking about is that the slave does not appear to be
> losing contact with the first-listed master. In fact, from the logs, it
> appears to be flipping back and forth (though not round-robinning).
Multiple masters is not about
>>>
Hi list,
I have a BIND9 server in a non public internet connected network. Most of
the \
functionality is working correctly but I have a specific problem.
The server 'resides' in a 3rd level zone ( e.g.
my-ns-server.level3.level2.level1. \
) for whic
On 7/26/2010 2:27 PM, Pete Vickers wrote:
On 7/26/2010 1:46 PM, Pete Vickers wrote:
Hi list,
I have a BIND9 server in a non public internet connected network. Most of the \
functionality is working correctly but I have a specific problem.
The server 'resides' in a 3rd level zone ( e.g.
m
- Original message -
> At present, i
> use the algorithm RSASHA-1 for DNSKEY, but i want migrate the RSASHA-1 to
> RSASHA-256, when i resigning the zone,it failed. so i wonder if DNSSEC
> supporting migrating RSASHA-1 to RSASHA-256 smoothly?
Yes, it does. Smoothness depends on the tim
> On 7/26/2010 1:46 PM, Pete Vickers wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > I have a BIND9 server in a non public internet connected network. Most of
> > the \
> > functionality is working correctly but I have a specific problem.
> > The server 'resides' in a 3rd level zone ( e.g.
> > my-ns-server.level3.
On 7/26/2010 1:46 PM, Pete Vickers wrote:
Hi list,
I have a BIND9 server in a non public internet connected network. Most of the
functionality is working correctly but I have a specific problem.
The server 'resides' in a 3rd level zone ( e.g. my-ns-server.level3.level2.level1.
) for which it
Hi list,
I have a BIND9 server in a non public internet connected network. Most of the
functionality is working correctly but I have a specific problem.
The server 'resides' in a 3rd level zone ( e.g.
my-ns-server.level3.level2.level1. ) for which it is SOA & NS, in addition it
is slave for th
In tcpdump I see:
Standard query response, Refused
On 07/26/2010 12:16 PM, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 26/07/10 16:56, Cory Coager wrote:
> 'nsupdate -g' responds with 'dns_request_getresponse: FORMERR'
Sorry then. I don't know. Personally I can't make nsupdate work at all
with GSSAPI; I get:
dns_t
On 26/07/10 16:56, Cory Coager wrote:
'nsupdate -g' responds with 'dns_request_getresponse: FORMERR'
Sorry then. I don't know. Personally I can't make nsupdate work at all
with GSSAPI; I get:
dns_tkey_buildgssquery failed: ran out of space
...before it even tries to talk to the network. I h
'nsupdate -g' responds with 'dns_request_getresponse: FORMERR'
On 07/26/2010 11:40 AM, Phil Mayers wrote:
On 26/07/10 16:32, Cory Coager wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask this but I am trying to
execute a DNS update using the nsupdate utility to update an A record
from a Lin
On 26/07/10 16:32, Cory Coager wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask this but I am trying to
execute a DNS update using the nsupdate utility to update an A record
from a Linux server to a Windows 2008 R2 DNS server. Sending the
request using 'nsupdate -o' responds with 'response
I'm not sure if this is the right place to ask this but I am trying to
execute a DNS update using the nsupdate utility to update an A record
from a Linux server to a Windows 2008 R2 DNS server. Sending the
request using 'nsupdate -o' responds with 'response to GSS-TSIG query
was unsuccessful'.
Hi,
I am running a test about the DNSSEC on my name servers. At present, i
use the algorithm RSASHA-1 for DNSKEY, but i want migrate the RSASHA-1 to
RSASHA-256, when i resigning the zone,it failed. so i wonder if DNSSEC
supporting migrating RSASHA-1 to RSASHA-256 smoothly?
___
On Jul 26, 2010, at 12:36 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
> On Jul 26, 2010, at 12:34 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
>>> From: Warren Kumari
>>> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:22:46 +0200
>>> Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org
>>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 25, 2010, at 4:33 AM, Danny Mayer wrote
On Jul 25, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> From: Warren Kumari
>> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:22:46 +0200
>> Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org
>>
>>
>> On Jul 25, 2010, at 4:33 AM, Danny Mayer wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/24/2010 5:10 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
On
On 2010-07-23 22:52, Peter Laws wrote:
> I would have expected that it would only ask the second-listed master if
> the first didn't answer ... but I didn't write the code (and haven't
> read it either!
And how would your slave ever pick up an update on "second-listed
master" that (for whatever re
On Jul 26, 2010, at 12:34 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>> From: Warren Kumari
>> Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2010 11:22:46 +0200
>> Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org
>>
>>
>> On Jul 25, 2010, at 4:33 AM, Danny Mayer wrote:
>>
>>> On 7/24/2010 5:10 AM, Warren Kumari wrote:
O
18 matches
Mail list logo
