> On 7/26/2010 1:46 PM, Pete Vickers wrote:
> > Hi list,
> > 
> > I have a BIND9 server in a non public internet connected network. Most of 
> > the \
> > functionality is working correctly but I have a specific problem. 
> > The server 'resides' in a 3rd level zone ( e.g. 
> > my-ns-server.level3.level2.level1. \
> > ) for which it is SOA&  NS, in addition it is slave for the level1 zone. 
> > 
> > sample from named.conf:
> > 
> > 
> > // slave level1 from masters.
> > zone "level1" {
> > type slave;
> > file "slave/level1";
> > notify no;
> > masters { 1.2.3.4; 1.2.3.5;  };
> > };
> > 
> > 
> > // forward directly to otherlevel2 due to absence delegation from level1
> > zone "otherlevel2.level1" {
> > type forward;
> > forwarders { 2.3.4.5; 2.3.4.6; };
> > };
> > 
> > 
> > (my root.hint also correctly references the private "." servers)
> > 
> > 
> > My problem is that when clients query my server for entries within \
> > "otherlevel2.level1", instead forwarding the queries directly to the 
> > declared \
> > forwarders, instead my server replies with NXDOMAIN  (presumably from the 
> > level1 \
> > slave data.) 
> > 
> > 
> > any insight appreciated
> > 
> Make sure an actual delegation exists from level1 to otherlevel2.level1. 
> The forwarding logic doesn't know to look for a subzone definition 
> unless it sees a delegation.
> 
>                                                                          
>                                                                          
>                                                      - Kevin

hmm. My problem is that the delegation _doesn't_ exist from level1 to 
otherlevel2.level1. That is what I'm try to work around with the forward 
statement directly referencing the NSs. 

The level1 zone is politically immutable, so fixing the problem there is not an 
option. Any other ideas ? (being a slave of the  otherlevel2.level1. zone is 
also not practical).



/Pete






_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reply via email to