In article <mailman.100.1280077153.15649.bind-us...@lists.isc.org>, "Laws, Peter C." <pl...@ou.edu> wrote:
> Understood, but what I'm asking about is that the slave does not appear to be > losing contact with the first-listed master. In fact, from the logs, it > appears to be flipping back and forth (though not round-robinning). Multiple masters is not about losing contact, it's about getting the most up-to-date version of the zone. There's no reason for the slave to assume that the first master has the best version of the zone. The only way to tell is to check the SOA records on all the masters, and perform a zone transfer from any of them that have a higher serial than the one you already have. -- Barry Margolin, bar...@alum.mit.edu Arlington, MA *** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group *** _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
