At Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:52:57 +0200,
Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> I have authoritative-only server with enough of memory to run with acache.
>
> I have set acache-cleaning-interval to 0 and I am wondering if it's safe
> when there will not be any periodic cleaning. If a domain is changed or
>
On 24.08.09 12:04, Faehl, Chris wrote:
> You've specified your policy as "neutral" in your SPF record with "?all".
>
> Try "-all", or "+all" if you're not ready to put some meat on your SPF plate.
I'd object against use of +all, I've read reports about spammers using that
to "exploit" the SPF s
On 20.08.09 15:19, Michael Fuese wrote:
> i need to know, how to setup a service like opendns.com.
>
> The opendns service is a free service where you can use
> their dns entries, to filter web-contents.
> They block bad domains or let users block their own domain-entries.
>
> What i need to know:
On 20.08.09 13:59, BBB Kee wrote:
> We are using solaris x86 bind-9.5.1-P3. I tried that
> when "rndc flushname www.hsbc.com.hk." and "dig a
> www.hsbc.com.hk." a few times, sometimes our
> nameserver reply servfail. It shouldn't be the memory
> problem as the daemon just started. Any clue of it
On Sep 3 2009, Mark Andrews wrote:
In message <200909030037.raa27...@nasdaq.hpl.hp.com>, Andris Kalnozols writes:
My 9.6.1-P1 dig programs (HP-UX and Linux) rather consistently fail
when trying to trace the delegation of 231.84.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA.
Out of curiousity, are others from different pla
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 01:18:33PM +0200,
Hauke Lampe wrote
a message of 95 lines which said:
> What we try to achieve is:
>
> - Validate DNSSEC signatures on resolvers close to the clients, using
> dlv.isc.org
> - Keep internal name resolution functioning, even if the connection to
> the out
6 matches
Mail list logo
