On 24.08.09 12:04, Faehl, Chris wrote: > You've specified your policy as "neutral" in your SPF record with "?all". > > Try "-all", or "+all" if you're not ready to put some meat on your SPF plate.
I'd object against use of +all, I've read reports about spammers using that to "exploit" the SPF system. I'd advise going to ~all or -all, depending on configuration of his mail systems. > -----Original Message----- > From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org > [mailto:bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of fakessh > Sent: Monday, August 24, 2009 10:32 AM > To: Bind users; Bind users > Subject: I have a question concerning the spf > > I use bind, and I have a configuration that seems normal to me on my server > > Here > fakessh.eu. IN MX 10 fakessh.eu. > fakessh.eu. IN TXT "v=spf1 ip4:94.23.60.255 mx mx:fakessh.eu ?all" add SPF record with the same content. > problem is when I'm trying to configure my mail server via > check-a...@verifier.port25.com and check-au...@verifier.port25.com > > spf field is marked as neutral, also follows senderid as neutral > > how to have the SPF OK, knowing that neutral is not really an answer Please move this discussion to SPF community mailing lists. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
