On 20.08.09 13:59, BBB Kee wrote: > We are using solaris x86 bind-9.5.1-P3. I tried that > when "rndc flushname www.hsbc.com.hk." and "dig a > www.hsbc.com.hk." a few times, sometimes our > nameserver reply servfail. It shouldn't be the memory > problem as the daemon just started. Any clue of it?
> ;; ANSWER SECTION: > www.hsbc.com.hk. 20 IN A 203.112.92.11 > > ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: > www.hsbc.com.hk. 900 IN NS mtyprdgss01.hsbc.com.hk. > www.hsbc.com.hk. 900 IN NS tkoprdgss02.hsbc.com.hk. > www.hsbc.com.hk. 900 IN NS tkoprdgss01.hsbc.com.hk. > > ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: > mtyprdgss01.hsbc.com.hk. 17 IN A 203.112.94.241 > tkoprdgss01.hsbc.com.hk. 577 IN A 203.112.92.241 > tkoprdgss02.hsbc.com.hk. 73 IN A 203.112.92.244 the www.hsbc.com.hk. is delegated (via glue NS record) to three servers and they all only reply with A record, no NS. I encountered the same problem with different domain under the same circumstances. I think that if www.hsbc.com.hk. is delegated to some servers, they should provide NS and SOA too... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. There's a long-standing bug relating to the x86 architecture that allows you to install Windows. -- Matthew D. Fuller _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
