Here's a question. Are we incapable of dealing with things like
underscores in hostnames? Is there any significant harm in adapting?
-david
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Ah yes, the perennial rathole...
Eric C. Davis wrote:
> I know the option to use this compliance checker is present, but I'm
> curious to know if there are plans to make it mandatory to comply. We
RFC 1123 has always been mandatory for Internet connected hosts. Valid
characters for a hostname a
hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> You *must* reference the location using the same URI if you expect to
>> see the same expected results.
>
> Thanks for your detailed explanations. Another issue: what do you
> mean by saying URI? What's the differences between URI and URL?
Just being more
In article , hongyi.z...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Friday, February 20, 2009 at 22:15, serge.fonvi...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Let me give an example to illustrate my problem:
>
> > In the following url, the prola.aps.org is a name-based virtual host:
>
> > http://prola.aps.org/pdf/PRB/v1/i1/p1_1
>
>
I suspect you have a broken application on 10.48.0.19.
Mark
In message <70fo2df49pf...@mid.individual.net>, Frank Kirschner writes:
> Hello,
> since last night we log emtpty queries (approx. 4000 per seconds) like
> this from a client in our LAN:
>
> 23-Feb-2009 13:20:15.516 qu
In message ,
asd...@gmail.com writes:
> 62.109.4.89 and 195.68.176.4 are compromized/attackers
Actually they are more likely to be under attack.
Make sure that you (and your ISP) have deployed the measures
in BCP 38 to ensure that you are not the source of such a
Eric C. Davis wrote:
> Are there plans for Bind to enforce hostname compliance according
> to RFC's or is this going to be left up to each DNS operator?
the question of benefit always arises when considering the
application of RFCs. It's probably better not enforcing things
just for the sake of c
At Tue, 17 Feb 2009 23:05:27 -0800,
Jack Tavares wrote:
> > My question is;
> >
> > the arpa/nameser.h file included does not include
> > type definitions for DNSKEY (or other dnssec rr types)
> > in the ns_type enum.
> >
> > am I looking in the wrong place?
>
> > No, you're looking at the right
And of course you can legitimately say it is a "Standard" even if it
isn't enforced by the software. Your argument would be that people
implementing new servers or attempting to access the systems wouldn't be
able to do so because they wouldn't have added the "exception to
Standard" that your PHB
> Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:07:31 +
> From: Evan Hunt
> To: "Eric C. Davis"
> Subject: Re: Hostname Naming Compliance
> Cc: "bind-users@lists.isc.org"
>
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 01:54:46PM -0500, Eric C. Davis wrote:
> > I know the option to use this compliance checker is present, but I'm
On Feb 23 2009, Evan Hunt wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 01:54:46PM -0500, Eric C. Davis wrote:
I know the option to use this compliance checker is present, but I'm
curious to know if there are plans to make it mandatory to comply. We
aren't using this feature now, but I would like to. My pr
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 01:54:46PM -0500, Eric C. Davis wrote:
> I know the option to use this compliance checker is present, but I'm
> curious to know if there are plans to make it mandatory to comply. We
> aren't using this feature now, but I would like to. My problem is
> politicking my way
I know the option to use this compliance checker is present, but I'm
curious to know if there are plans to make it mandatory to comply. We
aren't using this feature now, but I would like to. My problem is
politicking my way around the issue of breaking something that works.
If Bind were to s
On Feb 23, 2009, at 10:19 AM, Eric C. Davis wrote:
Are there plans for Bind to enforce hostname compliance according to
RFC's or is this going to be left up to each DNS operator?
It's present in BIND 9.3 and later. All characters except a-z, A-Z,
0-9, and "-" itself are forbidden to appear
Are there plans for Bind to enforce hostname compliance according to
RFC's or is this going to be left up to each DNS operator?
Eric Davis
Rockefeller University
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listin
On Feb 20, 2009, at 1:05 AM, Hongyi Zhao wrote:
Hi all,
Suppose a file named file.pdf stored in the following web location:
http://some_domain/path/to/file.pdf
Where, the *some_domain* is a name-based virtual host. In this case,
is it possible to set a ddns hostname, say through
http://www.ch
> Actually, it is a compile time problem.
>
> Is there a place on the isc.org website to report a bug on libbind?
>
> I ddn't see it anywhere.
libbind-b...@isc.org
--
Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org
Internet Systems Consortium, Inc.
___
bind-users mailing l
Actually, it is a compile time problem.
Is there a place on the isc.org website to report a bug on libbind?
I ddn't see it anywhere.
Thanks
--
Jack Tavares
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/b
In Mark Andrews writes:
In message <937393c4-77a8-4dba-8a4f-14560c25c...@o11g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,
>> SN writes:
>>>
>>> libcrypto.so.0.9.8 is not being found as a link library. Trying to
>>> run as in a chroot'ed environment on solaris 10 (core install).
>>> Kindly advise.
>> Insta
When using apache (you haven't told what web server you are using) you can
define a virtual host which has a server name hongyi_zhao.changeip.net and a
serveralias of some_domain. then apache will respond to urls which have
either in the host header with the defined virtual host. This assumes that
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 02:20:03PM +0100,
Frank Kirschner <147...@celebrate.de> wrote
a message of 65 lines which said:
> 23-Feb-2009 13:20:15.516 queries: info: client 10.48.0.19#2048: query:
> \(none\) IN A +
I have no idea. But capturing such queries with something like:
tcpdump -w dos-o
On Feb 23 2009, squid proxy wrote:
thx,
but what I cannot understand is:
I have 2 internal DNS server:
Master BIND 9.3.4-P1.1 (debian Etch)
SLAVE BIND BIND 9.5.1-P1 (debian Lenny)
they have the same number of zones, on both server is
recursion yes
and both have the same file zones.rfc1918 w
On Feb 19, 7:14 pm, Mark Andrews wrote:
> In message
> <937393c4-77a8-4dba-8a4f-14560c25c...@o11g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,
>
> SN writes:
> > Hi Group.
>
> > libcrypto.so.0.9.8 is not being found as a link library. Trying to
> > run as in a chroot'ed environment on solaris 10 (core install).
>
In Mark Andrews writes:
>In message <937393c4-77a8-4dba-8a4f-14560c25c...@o11g2000yql.googlegroups.com>,
> SN writes:
>>
>> libcrypto.so.0.9.8 is not being found as a link library. Trying to
>> run as in a chroot'ed environment on solaris 10 (core install).
>> Kindly advise.
> Install t
Hello,
since last night we log emtpty queries (approx. 4000 per seconds) like
this from a client in our LAN:
23-Feb-2009 13:20:15.516 queries: info: client 10.48.0.19#2048: query:
\(none\) IN A +
23-Feb-2009 13:20:15.518 queries: info: client 10.48.0.19#2048: query:
\(none\) IN A +
23-Feb-200
Hello,
since last night we log emtpty queries (approx. 4000 per seconds) like
this from a client in our LAN:
23-Feb-2009 13:20:15.516 queries: info: client 10.48.0.19#2048: query:
\(none\) IN A +
23-Feb-2009 13:20:15.518 queries: info: client 10.48.0.19#2048: query:
\(none\) IN A +
23-Feb-200
Hi all,
Suppose a file named file.pdf stored in the following web location:
http://some_domain/path/to/file.pdf
Where, the *some_domain* is a name-based virtual host. In this case,
is it possible to set a ddns hostname, say through
http://www.changeip.net/, without using *some_domain* itself
62.109.4.89 and 195.68.176.4 are compromized/attackers
See my post here:http://www.linuxforums.org/forum/redhat-fedora-linux-
help/140848-var-log-messages-question.html
Sample log entries:
Feb 19 08:24:17 asdlkf named[6459]: client 62.109.4.89#32721: query
(cache) './NS/IN' denied
Feb 19 08:24:18
Hi all,
Suppose a file named file.pdf stored in the following web location:
http://some_domain/path/to/file.pdf
Where, the *some_domain* is a name-based virtual host. In this case,
is it possible to set a ddns hostname, say through
http://www.changeip.net/, without using *some_domain* itself
thx,
but what I cannot understand is:
I have 2 internal DNS server:
Master BIND 9.3.4-P1.1 (debian Etch)
SLAVE BIND BIND 9.5.1-P1 (debian Lenny)
they have the same number of zones, on both server is
recursion yes
and both have the same file zones.rfc1918 with the same zones.
whay at master rn
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 11:49:01AM +, Luis Silva wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi Luis,
> I want to have two dns servers in the same machine, and I want the first
> one to forward the dns messages to the second. The problem is that I don't
> know how to configure bind to forward for a port different from
Hi all,
I want to have two dns servers in the same machine, and I want the first
one to forward the dns messages to the second. The problem is that I don't
know how to configure bind to forward for a port different from 53. Is that
possible?
Many thanks.
Kind Regards,
Luis
> In message , Chris
> Thom
> pson writes:
> > I have a dynamically updated zone, dynamic.local.test, on my workstation
> > testbed (BIND 9.6.0-P1, Solaris 10_x86) which has "zone-statistics yes"
> > set. Viewing the statistics at http://localhost:8053 I see under
> > "Zones for View _default"
33 matches
Mail list logo
