On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 01:54:46PM -0500, Eric C. Davis wrote: > I know the option to use this compliance checker is present, but I'm > curious to know if there are plans to make it mandatory to comply. We > aren't using this feature now, but I would like to. My problem is > politicking my way around the issue of breaking something that works. > If Bind were to say they were going to start forcing compliance with > this naming standard, then I simply have to say it's a standard that is > being enforced. Shouldn't enforcement be applied across the board > anyway instead of at the operator's discretion?
I haven't heard anyone at ISC suggest this, but if I did, I'd argue against it. I don't think we have any wish to be the "enforcers". :) And anyway, if we put "mandatory" compliance into BIND, people who wanted to break the rule would just hack it back out again. -- Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
