In <gnkslg$3u...@sf1.isc.org> Mark Andrews <mark_andr...@isc.org> writes:
In message <937393c4-77a8-4dba-8a4f-14560c25c...@o11g2000yql.googlegroups.com>, >> SN writes: >>> >>> libcrypto.so.0.9.8 is not being found as a link library. Trying to >>> run as in a chroot'ed environment on solaris 10 (core install). >>> Kindly advise. >> Install the package that includes OpenSSL. >> and Gary Mills <mi...@cc.umanitoba.ca> replied: >The Solaris 10 package is SUNWopenssl-libraries, but that provides >only /usr/sfw/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7. If bind requires On a Solaris 10 Sparc system: solaris% strings /usr/sfw/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.7 | grep security OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) AES part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) ASN.1 part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) Blowfish part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) Big Number part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) CAST part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) CONF part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) CONF_def part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) libdes part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) DES part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) Diffie-Hellman part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) DSA part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) EVP part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) lhash part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) MD2 part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) MD4 part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) MD5 part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) id-smime-aa-securityLabel id-smime-aa-securityLabel security PEM part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) RAND part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) RC2 part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) RC4 part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) RIPE-MD160 part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) RSA part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) SHA part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) SHA1 part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) Stack part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) TXT_DB part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) X.509 part of OpenSSL 0.9.7d 17 Mar 2004 (+ security patches to 2006-09-29) solaris% The filename contains "0.9.7" but the file itself contains security patches which, I believe, makes it equivalent to 0.9.8. That is what my libcrypto expert told me. I have built 9.6.0-P1 on Solaris 10, and I am running it as a cacheing- only name server. My production name servers are also 9.6.0-P1, but those computers are still running Solaris 9. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Barry S. Finkel Computing and Information Systems Division Argonne National Laboratory Phone: +1 (630) 252-7277 9700 South Cass Avenue Facsimile:+1 (630) 252-4601 Building 222, Room D209 Internet: bsfin...@anl.gov Argonne, IL 60439-4828 IBMMAIL: I1004994 _______________________________________________ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
