In article ,
"Frank Bulk" wrote:
> Sorry for not being more clear. It's my understanding that "rndc stats"
> dumps only a subset of what ARM provides.
You still don't make sense. ARM is documentation, it doesn't provide
any statistics. ARM = Administrator's Reference Manual for BIND.
>
Sorry for not being more clear. It's my understanding that "rndc stats"
dumps only a subset of what ARM provides.
Regards,
Frank
-Original Message-
From: JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 [mailto:jinmei_tat...@isc.org]
Sent: Monday, January 19, 2009 1:38 PM
To: Frank Bulk
Cc: bind-us...@isc.org
S
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, JINMEI Tatuya / 神明達哉 wrote:
At Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:06:13 -0600 (CST),
David Forrest wrote:
On startup of named 9.6.0 I get the following message:
Jan 17 11:55:20 maplepark named[13014]: max open files (1024) is smaller than
max sockets (4096)
Is this a problem for a sm
It's perfectly valid to list any or all of the zone's authoritative
servers, whether they are primary master or slave.
Chris Buxton
Professional Services
Men & Mice
On Jan 19, 2009, at 1:40 PM, Kyle McDonald wrote:
Hi,
I have what I hope is an easy question:
When settingup a 'stub' zone, i
Hi,
I have what I hope is an easy question:
When settingup a 'stub' zone, is it only valid to list the primary
server for the zone in the 'masters {...};' config line?
Or is it OK to list secondary servers in that list also?
-Kyle
___
bind-users ma
At Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:40:28 +1100,
Nathan Ollerenshaw wrote:
> I have an Authoritative BIND server. It is configured to only allow
> recursive queries from localhost, with recursion disabled for any
> remote clients.
[snip]
> The ideal solution for me, would be a bind configuration option
At Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:18:59 +0330,
"Bind" wrote:
> I have worked with bind 9 in single thread,but i want to upgrade my server
> to solaris 10 and bind 9.5.1-P1(my machine has 4Gig Ram and 2 cpu(900mhz))
> Based on practical experience:
> does enable multithreading for Bind 9.5.1 is good or not?
At Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:06:13 -0600 (CST),
David Forrest wrote:
> On startup of named 9.6.0 I get the following message:
>
> Jan 17 11:55:20 maplepark named[13014]: max open files (1024) is smaller than
> max sockets (4096)
>
> Is this a problem for a small internal network dns server?
It depe
At Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:37:25 -0600,
"Frank Bulk" wrote:
> Thanks for the info -- is there a way that there can be feature parity, at
> least in terms of stats reported, between ARM and "rndc stats"?
I don't understand the question...what do you mean by 'feature parity
between ARM and "rndc stats
This issue of how applications and operating systems resolve single-word
TLDs and host names was discussed on NANOG some time ago:
http://www.mail-archive.com/na...@nanog.org/msg03092.html
Regards,
Frank
-Original Message-
From: bind-users-boun...@lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-boun...
On Jan 19, 2009, at 7:48 AM, John Wobus wrote:
Nathan Ollerenshaw escreveu:
I have an Authoritative BIND server. It is configured to only allow
recursive queries from localhost, with recursion disabled for any
remote clients.
If you attempt to perform a recursive query against this server
On Jan 19 2009, Joe Baptista wrote:
So a little more testing using firefox as an application gives us some
interesting results. Using the .TM TLD I entered http://tm/ into my
browsers. It did not work. Firefox replaced http://tm/ with
http://www.tm.com/ - which is not the web site I wanted to
So a little more testing using firefox as an application gives us some
interesting results. Using the .TM TLD I entered http://tm/ into my
browsers. It did not work. Firefox replaced http://tm/ with
http://www.tm.com/ - which is not the web site I wanted to reach.
However - if we qualify the TL
Well - like I said below - it is not recommended to simply use http://tld/ -
however there are a few IANA TLDs that in fact are setup with A records
associated with TLDs. Just did a test out of curiosity and found the
following ccTLDs with A records.
AC. 86400 IN A 193.223.78.210
AF. 86400 IN
On Jan 19, 2009, at 5:02 AM, Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães wrote:
Nathan Ollerenshaw escreveu:
I have an Authoritative BIND server. It is configured to only allow
recursive queries from localhost, with recursion disabled for any
remote clients.
If you attempt to perform a recursive query
On Thu, Jan 08, 2009 at 02:46:44AM -0800,
Milo Hyson wrote
a message of 127 lines which said:
> stale glue records for our name-servers that appear to be coming
> from a domain we host that is owned by someone else.
I don't really like to work on hypothetical situations. Either you
post the r
Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães escreveu:
Nathan Ollerenshaw escreveu:
I have an Authoritative BIND server. It is configured to only allow
recursive queries from localhost, with recursion disabled for any
remote clients.
If you attempt to perform a recursive query against this server, it
Nathan Ollerenshaw escreveu:
I have an Authoritative BIND server. It is configured to only allow
recursive queries from localhost, with recursion disabled for any
remote clients.
If you attempt to perform a recursive query against this server, it
will respond with a "query refused" packet
Bryce,
The following format is correct:
2.5.0.0.1.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.a.0.0.0.6.d.f.0.ip6.arpa
Webmin is formatting the entry incorrectly.
Regards,
David
Dr David Holder CEng FIET MIEEE
Erion Ltd, Oaklei
19 matches
Mail list logo
