--- On Fri, 12/5/08, Kevin Darcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Kevin Darcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: how to archieve this?
> To: "bind-users"
> Date: Friday, December 5, 2008, 2:17 PM
> If you have money to spend, just buy a commercial
> load-balancing solution.
>
I checked F5'
If you have money to spend, just buy a commercial load-balancing solution.
- Kevin
Ken DBA wrote:
Or, does Bind developer group provide commercial development for this purpose?
We can pay for it.
--- On Fri, 12/5/08, Chris Buxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Chris Buxton <[EMAIL PRO
Or, does Bind developer group provide commercial development for this purpose?
We can pay for it.
--- On Fri, 12/5/08, Chris Buxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Chris Buxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: how to archieve this?
> To: "bind-users"
> Date: Friday, December 5, 2008, 1:10
While I have no experience with the performance of lbnamed, I have heard
that the resolving name servers used by OpenDNS run a name server
program written in Perl. (I forget the name of the package.)
Performance is a problem that can be overcome with optimizations and by
throwing more hardware at
--- On Fri, 12/5/08, ivan jr sy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: ivan jr sy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: how to archieve this?
> To: "bind-users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Friday, December 5, 2008, 12:05 PM
> refer to 'split' DNS using views
>
> here's something:
>
--- On Fri, 12/5/08, Chris Buxton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> An example that you may find useful as a starting point is
> lbnamed. It's
> old and probably has some bugs in its protocol handling,
> but it does
> something along the lines that you're looking for.
>
Thanks for the info.
I ha
Depending on the rules you intend to use, you may find that BIND simply
isn't suited to this purpose. You may need to write your own name server
implementation, using a set of F5 appliances, or something else.
If you do this, you are probably best off handling as much as you can
using BIND, and th
refer to 'split' DNS using views
here's something:
http://www.zytrax.com/books/dns/ch7/view.html
in a nutshell.. you have to
- have 2 views, same zone per view
- either have two different zone files... and maintain it separately. (or you
may have two zone files and segregate the differences, whi
Hello,
We are running a commercial site. We want bind to execute some additional
actions before the response, listed as below:
1) Client querys for www.site.com's ARR.
2) Bind gets client's IP, and calculate something based on this IP.
3) If IP matchs condition A, return the ARR of "www.site.com
BIND 9.6.0rc1 is now available.
BIND 9.6.0rc1 is a release candidate for BIND 9.6.0.
Please as a minimum perform a test build on your operating
system. We don't have test platforms for every operating
system and sometimes we accidently break builds. Now i
BIND 9.5.1rc1 is now available.
BIND 9.5.1rc1 is a maintenance release candidate for BIND 9.5.
BIND 9.5.1rc1 can be downloaded from
ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.5.1rc1/bind-9.5.1rc1.tar.gz
The PGP signature of the distribution is at
ftp://ftp.isc.org/i
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
pollex writes:
> On 4 dic, 10:59, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 --enable-threads=3Dyes
> >
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> com>,
> >
> > pollex writes:
> > > On 3 dic, 21:08, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > In messa
On 4 dic, 10:59, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --enable-threads=yes
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
> pollex writes:
> > On 3 dic, 21:08, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > com>,
>
> > > pollex writes:
> > > > Hi Jinmei I have f
On Dec 3, 10:00 pm, Kevin Darcy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> will wrote:
> > For bureaucratic reasons I can not multi-home the slave name server;
> > however, I can multi-home the master name server.
>
> > I understand from reading the 'DNS for Rocket Scientist' that when
> > using a 'view' stateme
Huh?
sftp uses secure transport as does scp and both use the same keys as
ssh. I can see no way in which ftps would be viewed as superior.
Exactly how are you "losing" RSA keys and if you do aren't you more
concerned that you can no longer ssh into the box?
___
--enable-threads=yes
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
pollex writes:
> On 3 dic, 21:08, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> com>,
> >
> > pollex writes:
> > > Hi Jinmei I have followed your advice and I have installed and
> > > compiled the Bind 9.3
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 12:28:38PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
>
> We need BIND 9.3.5-P2 version. But we are not getting the Download
> link.Kindly provide me the link. so that we can download this version,.
>
ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.3.5-P2
--
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
On 3 dic, 21:08, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
>
> pollex writes:
> > Hi Jinmei I have followed your advice and I have installed and
> > compiled the Bind 9.3.6 with the following command:
> > STD_CDEFINES="-ISC_SOCKET_FDSETSIZE=4096" ./configure --prefix
Dear Team
We need BIND 9.3.5-P2 version. But we are not getting the Download
link.Kindly provide me the link. so that we can download this version,.
Thanks & regds
Abhilash
This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain confide
You don't need to multi-home either. Read the FAQ.
Mark
--
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@li
will wrote:
For bureaucratic reasons I can not multi-home the slave name server;
however, I can multi-home the master name server.
I understand from reading the 'DNS for Rocket Scientist' that when
using a 'view' statement to setup a split DNS to control visibility
that the slave servers for eac
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On Dec 3, 6:26 pm, Mark Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > If it is a forged packet it should be dropped regardless of the setting
> > of RD.
>
> True, however not something that's easily determined from a distance.
>
> Ideally ing
22 matches
Mail list logo
