In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Ford writes:
> Is there any indication about why named shuts down immediately in those
> logfiles?
>
> -david
One can always start named using "named -g "
which will send the log messages to the screen and stop named
becoming a daemon
no, if not I was not writing here.
I compile and run bing from version 4 and I have compiled and runned each
bind version one by one...
till today I can't count how many ;)
---
Alberto Colosi
IBM Global Business Services
Sistemi Informativi S.P.A.
IT NetWork & Secur
Is there any indication about why named shuts down immediately in those
logfiles?
-david
Alberto Colosi/SI/RM/GSI/it wrote:
>
> For sure as IBM or Microsoft or an org so big could have!.
> My named.conf is really full of ACL and confs.
>
> my logging channels are: (but I should find something
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Sparks writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>> A border router knows what is "inside" and "outside" your network, while
> >>> a DNS server does not. Important difference.
> >> You're missing the point. This is not about inside and outside networks,
> it
> >
For sure as IBM or Microsoft or an org so big could have!.
My named.conf is really full of ACL and confs.
my logging channels are: (but I should find something inside one of
them or /var/log/messages ;) mainly from 9.0 till 9.5.1b3
is working! what is different inside 9.6 ???
Look at your log files, commonly in /var/log/
Did you define other logfiles in your named.conf that you had working
with 9.51b3?
-david
Alberto Colosi/SI/RM/GSI/it wrote:
>
> Hi, why I have BIND from 4 and 8 releases and from born of 9 release I
> lifted up till 9.5.1b3 that is working fine.
>
>
Hi, why I have BIND from 4 and 8 releases and from born of 9 release I
lifted up till 9.5.1b3 that is working fine.
I tried to compile and run ISC BIND 9.6.0b1 with some configure switches
and /etc/rc.d/init.d/rc-script statements.
Why I get back no errors inside ISC BIND files but in t
At Wed, 26 Nov 2008 10:34:59 -0800 (PST),
ivan jr sy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know this is a an old thread, but I wish to resurrect this in
> hopes to find answers..
>
> 9.5 + threads on FreeBSD 7 is better performance wise, but there is
> this problem.
>
> 9.4 + threads on FreeBSD 7 is a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> A border router knows what is "inside" and "outside" your network, while
>>> a DNS server does not. Important difference.
>> You're missing the point. This is not about inside and outside networks, it
>> is about rfc1918 responses from internet queries.
>
> I'm afraid
> > A border router knows what is "inside" and "outside" your network, while
> > a DNS server does not. Important difference.
>
> You're missing the point. This is not about inside and outside networks, it
> is about rfc1918 responses from internet queries.
I'm afraid I have seen too many organi
On Nov 26, 2008, at 11:49 AM, David Sparks wrote:
However, if you're concerned, it's pretty easy to set up a more
secure
infrastructure. Put a resolver (resolving name server) at the edge of
your network (in a DMZ, presumably) that knows nothing of internal
domains (nor IP address space). It re
> However, if you're concerned, it's pretty easy to set up a more secure
> infrastructure. Put a resolver (resolving name server) at the edge of
> your network (in a DMZ, presumably) that knows nothing of internal
> domains (nor IP address space). It refuses to send queries to private
> addresses,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> A good border router will do a few things for network hygiene. It will
>> filter
>> incoming packets that have a source address from the internal network, and it
>> will filter outgoing packets that don't have a source IP in the internal
>> network.
>>
>> A DNS server
--- On Thu, 11/27/08, David Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: David Sparks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: rfc1918 ns records coming from internet are queried?
> To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thursday, November 27, 2008, 7:43 AM
> >> I'm looking for a way to set
> A good border router will do a few things for network hygiene. It will filter
> incoming packets that have a source address from the internal network, and it
> will filter outgoing packets that don't have a source IP in the internal
> network.
>
> A DNS server should do a similar thing: it wil
The queries from the resolver to internal name servers caused by
incorrect referrals for outside domains *should* cause no harm.
However, if you're concerned, it's pretty easy to set up a more secure
infrastructure. Put a resolver (resolving name server) at the edge of
your network (in a DM
>> I'm looking for a way to set a policy that named wont
>> query
>> rfc1918 nameserver addresses returned from a non-rfc1918 query.
>> Would this be
>> a bad policy?
>
> You could use netmasks with your server statements, like this:
>
> server 10.0.0.0/8 {
> bogus yes;
> };
>
> server 1
Hi all,
I know this is a an old thread, but I wish to resurrect this in hopes to find
answers..
9.5 + threads on FreeBSD 7 is better performance wise, but there is this
problem.
9.4 + threads on FreeBSD 7 is almost 50% of the performance, but there is no
issues like this. 9.5 without threads
I am trying to build Bind with Visual C++ Express 2005, but get 151 errors
and 47 warnings.I already have OpenSSL built and prior to opening the DSW
inside win32utils in Visual C++ Express 2005 I ran buildsetup.bat without
problems
I have the FrameworkSDK v6.0 installed and added the bin to the pat
19 matches
Mail list logo
