For sure as IBM or Microsoft or an org so big could have!.
My named.conf is really full of ACL and confs.
my logging channels are: (but I should find something inside one of
them or /var/log/messages ;) mainly from 9.0 till 9.5.1b3
is working! what is different inside 9.6 ????????
logging{
channel sec{
file "/var/named/log/sec.log" versions 2 size 2m;
print-time yes;
print-category yes;
print-severity yes;
};
channel in_out{
file "/var/named/log/xfer.log" versions 2 size 2m;
print-time yes;
print-category yes;
print-severity yes;
};
channel named_log{
file "/var/named/log/general.log" versions 2 size 2m;
print-time yes;
print-category yes;
print-severity yes;
};
channel upd_log{
file "/var/named/log/update.log" versions 2 size 2m;
print-time yes;
print-category yes;
print-severity yes;
};
channel log_lame{
file "/var/named/log/lame.log" versions 2 size 2m;
print-time yes;
print-category yes;
print-severity yes;
};
channel dnssec_log {
file "/var/named/log/dnssec.log" versions 2 size 2m;
print-time yes;
print-category yes;
print-severity yes;
severity debug 3;
};
channel edns {
file "/var/named/log/edns.log" versions 2 size 2m;
print-time yes;
print-category yes;
print-severity yes;
severity debug 3;
};
channel "querylog" {
file "/var/named/log/queries.log" versions 2 size 2m;
print-time yes;
print-category yes;
print-severity yes;
};
-------------------------------
Alberto Colosi
IBM Global Business Services
Sistemi Informativi S.P.A.
IT NetWork & Security Department
*-* *-* *-*
SECURITY IS EVERYONE'S BUSINESS
Member of
IBM Information Security WW CoP
David Ford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
27/11/2008 00.31
To
Alberto Colosi/SI/RM/GSI/it <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
bind-users@lists.isc.org
Subject
Re: ISC BIND
Look at your log files, commonly in /var/log/
Did you define other logfiles in your named.conf that you had working
with 9.51b3?
-david
Alberto Colosi/SI/RM/GSI/it wrote:
>
> Hi, why I have BIND from 4 and 8 releases and from born of 9 release I
> lifted up till 9.5.1b3 that is working fine.
>
> I tried to compile and run ISC BIND 9.6.0b1 with some configure
> switches and /etc/rc.d/init.d/rc-script statements.
>
> Why I get back no errors inside ISC BIND files but in the end ISC BIND
> 9.6.0b1 does not remain as daemon serving user requests?!.
_______________________________________________
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
