Mirsky , sajassi=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org
, draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-p...@ietf.org
, John E Drake
Subject: RE: [bess] Implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05
Hi Mathew,
+1 on going ahead with this draft.
As Greg suggested in the other thread, we can draft an extension to include
; BESS
Cc: Greg Mirsky ; sajassi=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org;
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-p...@ietf.org; John E Drake
Subject: Re: [bess] Implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05
Greg
Thank you
I am good to close the implementation poll, but I believe there may be some
) , BESS
Cc: John E Drake ,
sajassi=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org ,
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-p...@ietf.org
, Greg Mirsky
Subject: Re: [bess] Implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05
Hi Matthew and BESS WG,
I was informed that our product does support using most of the sub-TLVs
;D
> Institute/Wireline Product Operation Division
>
>
>
> E: gregory.mir...@ztetx.com
> www.zte.com.cn
> Original Mail
> *Sender: *JohnEDrake
> *To: *Ali Sajassi (sajassi);Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB);bess@ietf.org;
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-p...@ietf.org;
> *D
Hi Matthew,
As others have indicated, this draft defines necessary mechanisms to apply
LSP-Ping to EVPN, and provides much needed OAM capabilities. I believe we
should proceed with publication.
Thank you,
Samer
On 8/9/21, 4:25 PM, "Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB)"
wrote:
WG and Authors
Hi Matthew,
Cisco does not have a shipping implementation of the draft.
As Ali and many other experts replied, LSP ping is widely used for detecting
data plane failures in mpls network. This draft defines necessary Target FEC
sub-TLVs for EVPN and I think this is an important draft that should
.@ztetx.com
Cc: matthew.bo...@nokia.com; sajassi=40cisco@dmarc.ietf.org;
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-p...@ietf.org; jdrake=40juniper....@dmarc.ietf.org;
bess@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] Implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05
As a WG member providing operators feedback, I agree w
...@ietf.org
, bess@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] Implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05
Hi Matthew,
my apologies for the belated response:
1. I am still awaiting a response from our product team on whether any
part of the draft is supported.
2. I concur with Ali. LSP Ping
nstitute/Wireline Product Operation Division
>
>
>
> E: gregory.mir...@ztetx.com
> www.zte.com.cn
> Original Mail
> *Sender: *JohnEDrake
> *To: *Ali Sajassi (sajassi);Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB);bess@ietf.org;
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-p...@ietf.org;
>
.mir...@ztetx.com
www.zte.com.cn
Original Mail
Sender: JohnEDrake
To: Ali Sajassi (sajassi);Bocci, Matthew (Nokia -
GB);bess@ietf.org;draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-p...@ietf.org;
Date: 2021/08/31 11:34
Subject: Re: [bess] Implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-pin
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Hi Matthew,
Some of the co-authors are on PTO and I couldn’t reach them (typical of the
month of August). So, I’d like to get a bit more extension.
Regarding the two questions below:
1. My company hasn’t implemented
Hi Matthew,
Some of the co-authors are on PTO and I couldn’t reach them (typical of the
month of August). So, I’d like to get a bit more extension.
Regarding the two questions below:
1. My company hasn’t implemented it.
2. I do think that we should process with the publication as it descr
WG and Authors
Unfortunately I have not seen any responses indicating that there are any known
implementations of this draft. I also did not see any responses to Stephane's
question if we should proceed regardless.
As per the BESS WG implementation policy
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg
13 matches
Mail list logo