I have following queries regarding this draft:

>>>> Do we intend-to-use/call-out-usage-of “wild-card/don’t-care” values for 
>>>> attributes carried in the sub-TLVs ?
For example, If the admin intends  to check the reachability to host 
(MAC_X/IP_X) published (in route-type-2)  by remote PE.
The remote PE learnt it locally over ESI_X against Vlan X (mapped to BD_XYZ).

Is it possible, that the “EVPN MAC sub-tlv”  can carry the “Route 
Distinguisher” and “Ethernet Segment Identifier” as don’t care.

>>>> Another caseto handle would be test the reachability to tenant-VRF VRF_X 
>>>> (with EVPN mapped EVI) configured on the remote PE, PE1.
VRF_X has no active IP/IPv6 interface configured and its sole usage is to 
obtain the leaked (via IVRL) routes from other VRFs (non-EVPN) and PE1 
published this to other peers via EVPN control plane. Till the first prefix 
(learnt ) route is published (Route Type 5) by PE1 for the EVI (mapped to 
VRF_X), the tunnels will not be provisioned on other PEs.
In order to test the reachability to VRF_X (on PE1) from another PEs, let’s 
say, PE2 or a centralized-controller (which can emulate/supports MPLS),

It may need to carry all/subset-of attributes with “don’t-care/wild-card” in 
“EVPN IP Prefix Sub-TLV”.


Please let know your thoughts on above.

Thanks
Saumya.

From: BESS [mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gyan Mishra
Sent: Wednesday, September 1, 2021 11:26 AM
To: gregory.mir...@ztetx.com
Cc: matthew.bo...@nokia.com; sajassi=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org; 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-p...@ietf.org; jdrake=40juniper....@dmarc.ietf.org; 
bess@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bess] Implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05


As a WG member providing operators  feedback, I agree with Ali that we should 
proceed with publication.  I support progression of this draft.

As Greg has noted that LSP OAM ping has been utilized as a critical tool for 
operations in data plane troubleshooting of control plane against data plane 
failures.

This document describes a critical mechanism for operators to detect data plane 
failures using the same LSP ping widely used, now being applied to MPLS or 
SR-MPLS based  NG L2 VPN EVPN & PBB-EVPN using 4 new FEC Stack Sub TLVs, EVPN 
MAC/IP Sub TLV for EVPN Type 2 advertisements, EVPN I-PMSI inclusive P-Tree for 
EVPN Type 3 advertisement, EVPN Auto discovery Sub TLV for EVPN Type 1 AD 
advertisement and finally EVPN IP Prefix Sub TLV for EVPN Type 5 advertisement.

Kind Regards

Gyan
Verizon

On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 5:36 PM 
<gregory.mir...@ztetx.com<mailto:gregory.mir...@ztetx.com>> wrote:

Hi Matthew,

my apologies for the belated response:

1.     I am still awaiting a response from our product team on whether any part 
of the draft is supported.

2.     I concur with Ali. LSP Ping is a broadly used OAM tool detecting and 
localizing failures, including discrepancies between the data and control 
planes. The document defines necessary Target FEC sub-TLVs for EVPN and MVPN 
cases.



Regards,

Greg Mirsky



Sr. Standardization Expert
预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline Product R&D 
Institute/Wireline Product Operation Division


[cid:image001.gif@01D79F59.CAE267A0]
[cid:image002.gif@01D79F59.CAE267A0]
E: gregory.mir...@ztetx.com<mailto:gregory.mir...@ztetx.com>
www.zte.com.cn<http://www.zte.com.cn/>
Original Mail
Sender: JohnEDrake
To: Ali Sajassi (sajassi);Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - 
GB);bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>;draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-p...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-p...@ietf.org>;
Date: 2021/08/31 11:34
Subject: Re: [bess] Implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org<mailto:BESS@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>
Hi,

I agree with Ali.

Yours Irrespectively,

John



Juniper Business Use Only
From: BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org>> On Behalf Of 
Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
Sent: Friday, August 27, 2021 9:54 PM
To: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) 
<matthew.bo...@nokia.com<mailto:matthew.bo...@nokia.com>>; 
bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>; 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-p...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-p...@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bess] Implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05

[External Email. Be cautious of content]

Hi Matthew,

Some of the co-authors are on PTO and I couldn’t reach them (typical of the 
month of August). So, I’d like to get a bit more extension.

Regarding the two questions below:

1.     My company hasn’t implemented it.

2.     I do think that we should process with the publication as it describes 
how LSP ping can be used to detect data-plane failures for various EVPN 
functionality including aliasing, split-horizon filtering using ESI label, 
multicast, l2-unicast, l3-unicast, IRB, etc. For MPLS transport tunnel, I am 
not aware of any other tool/draft that allows us to do data-plane failure 
detection. Thus, I think it is important to proceed with its publications.

Still I’d like to hear from other co-authors and other people in this community.

Regards,
Ali

From: Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) 
<matthew.bo...@nokia.com<mailto:matthew.bo...@nokia.com>>
Date: Monday, August 9, 2021 at 6:25 AM
To: bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org> <bess@ietf.org<mailto:bess@ietf.org>>, 
draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-p...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-p...@ietf.org>
 
<draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-p...@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-p...@ietf.org>>
Subject: Implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05
WG and Authors

Unfortunately I have not seen any responses indicating that there are any known 
implementations of this draft. I also did not see any responses to Stephane's 
question if we should proceed regardless.

As per the BESS WG implementation policy 
(https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw/<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw/>),
 please can you respond to this email indicating either:

- That you are aware of any implementations (ideally providing some details)
- If you are not aware of any, if you think the WG should proceed with the 
draft's publication and why.

I will close this poll on 25th August 2021.

Regards

Matthew


On 14/06/2021, 17:38, "BESS on behalf of 
internet-dra...@ietf.org<mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org>" 
<bess-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of 
internet-dra...@ietf.org<mailto:bess-boun...@ietf.org%20on%20behalf%20of%20internet-dra...@ietf.org>>
 wrote:


    A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
directories.
    This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF.

            Title           : LSP-Ping Mechanisms for EVPN and PBB-EVPN
            Authors         : Parag Jain
                              Samer Salam
                              Ali Sajassi
                              Sami Boutros
                              Greg Mirsky
         Filename        : draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05.txt
         Pages           : 15
         Date            : 2021-06-14

    Abstract:
       LSP-Ping is a widely deployed Operation, Administration, and
       Maintenance (OAM) mechanism in MPLS networks.  This document
       describes mechanisms for detecting data-plane failures using LSP Ping
       in MPLS based EVPN and PBB-EVPN networks.


    The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
    
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping/<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping/>

    There is also an htmlized version available at:
    
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05>

    A diff from the previous version is available at:
    
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05<https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05>


    Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
    ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/<ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/>


    _______________________________________________
    BESS mailing list
    BESS@ietf.org<mailto:BESS@ietf.org>
    
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>


_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org<mailto:BESS@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess<https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>
--

[Image removed by sender.]<http://www.verizon.com/>

Gyan Mishra

Network Solutions Architect

Email gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com<mailto:gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com>

M 301 502-1347

_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to