As a WG member providing operators  feedback, I agree with Ali that we
should proceed with publication.  I support progression of this draft.

As Greg has noted that LSP OAM ping has been utilized as a critical tool
for operations in data plane troubleshooting of control plane against data
plane failures.

This document describes a critical mechanism for operators to detect data
plane failures using the same LSP ping widely used, now being applied to
MPLS or SR-MPLS based  NG L2 VPN EVPN & PBB-EVPN using 4 new FEC Stack Sub
TLVs, EVPN MAC/IP Sub TLV for EVPN Type 2 advertisements, EVPN I-PMSI
inclusive P-Tree for EVPN Type 3 advertisement, EVPN Auto discovery Sub TLV
for EVPN Type 1 AD advertisement and finally EVPN IP Prefix Sub TLV for
EVPN Type 5 advertisement.

Kind Regards

Gyan
Verizon

On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 5:36 PM <gregory.mir...@ztetx.com> wrote:

> Hi Matthew,
>
> my apologies for the belated response:
>
>    1.
>
>    I am still awaiting a response from our product team on whether any
>    part of the draft is supported.
>    2.
>
>    I concur with Ali. LSP Ping is a broadly used OAM tool detecting and
>    localizing failures, including discrepancies between the data and control
>    planes. The document defines necessary Target FEC sub-TLVs for EVPN and
>    MVPN cases.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Greg Mirsky
>
>
> Sr. Standardization Expert
> 预研标准部/有线研究院/有线产品经营部 Standard Preresearch Dept./Wireline Product R&D
> Institute/Wireline Product Operation Division
>
>
>
> E: gregory.mir...@ztetx.com
> www.zte.com.cn
> Original Mail
> *Sender: *JohnEDrake
> *To: *Ali Sajassi (sajassi);Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB);bess@ietf.org;
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-p...@ietf.org;
> *Date: *2021/08/31 11:34
> *Subject: **Re: [bess] Implementation poll for
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05*
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I agree with Ali.
>
>
>
> Yours Irrespectively,
>
>
>
> John
>
>
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> *From:* BESS <bess-boun...@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of * Ali Sajassi (sajassi)
> *Sent:* Friday, August 27, 2021 9:54 PM
> *To:* Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) <matthew.bo...@nokia.com>; bess@ietf.org;
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-p...@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [bess] Implementation poll for
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05
>
>
>
> *[External Email. Be cautious of content]*
>
>
>
> Hi Matthew,
>
>
>
> Some of the co-authors are on PTO and I couldn’t reach them (typical of
> the month of August). So, I’d like to get a bit more extension.
>
>
>
> Regarding the two questions below:
>
>    1.
>
>    My company hasn’t implemented it.
>    2.
>
>    I do think that we should process with the publication as it describes
>    how LSP ping can be used to detect data-plane failures for various EVPN
>    functionality including aliasing, split-horizon filtering using ESI label,
>    multicast, l2-unicast, l3-unicast, IRB, etc. For MPLS transport tunnel, I
>    am not aware of any other tool/draft that allows us to do data-plane
>    failure detection. Thus, I think it is important to proceed with its
>    publications.
>
>
>
> Still I’d like to hear from other co-authors and other people in this
> community.
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Ali
>
>
>
> *From: *Bocci, Matthew (Nokia - GB) <matthew.bo...@nokia.com>
> *Date: *Monday, August 9, 2021 at 6:25 AM
> *To: *bess@ietf.org <bess@ietf.org>,
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-p...@ietf.org <
> draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-p...@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *Implementation poll for draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05
>
> WG and Authors
>
> Unfortunately I have not seen any responses indicating that there are any
> known implementations of this draft. I also did not see any responses to
> Stephane's question if we should proceed regardless.
>
> As per the BESS WG implementation policy (
> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw/
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/cG3X1tTqb_vPC4rg56SEdkjqDpw/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RoQdN1xrngG7wEPSC6AqHesQtzGvBMP82cosyeO0PYZjTGA5JLyFmli4v8nM3No$>),
> please can you respond to this email indicating either:
>
> - That you are aware of any implementations (ideally providing some
> details)
> - If you are not aware of any, if you think the WG should proceed with the
> draft's publication and why.
>
> I will close this poll on 25th August 2021.
>
> Regards
>
> Matthew
>
>
> On 14/06/2021, 17:38, "BESS on behalf of internet-dra...@ietf.org" 
> <bess-boun...@ietf.org
> on behalf of internet-dra...@ietf.org> wrote:
>
>
>     A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
>     This draft is a work item of the BGP Enabled ServiceS WG of the IETF.
>
>             Title           : LSP-Ping Mechanisms for EVPN and PBB-EVPN
>             Authors         : Parag Jain
>                               Samer Salam
>                               Ali Sajassi
>                               Sami Boutros
>                               Greg Mirsky
>          Filename        : draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05.txt
>          Pages           : 15
>          Date            : 2021-06-14
>
>     Abstract:
>        LSP-Ping is a widely deployed Operation, Administration, and
>        Maintenance (OAM) mechanism in MPLS networks.  This document
>        describes mechanisms for detecting data-plane failures using LSP
> Ping
>        in MPLS based EVPN and PBB-EVPN networks.
>
>
>     The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping/
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RoQdN1xrngG7wEPSC6AqHesQtzGvBMP82cosyeO0PYZjTGA5JLyFmli4CFZvJAM$>
>
>     There is also an htmlized version available at:
>     https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RoQdN1xrngG7wEPSC6AqHesQtzGvBMP82cosyeO0PYZjTGA5JLyFmli4RLT2-5Q$>
>
>     A diff from the previous version is available at:
>     https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bess-evpn-lsp-ping-05__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RoQdN1xrngG7wEPSC6AqHesQtzGvBMP82cosyeO0PYZjTGA5JLyFmli44UwE5yg$>
>
>
>     Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>     ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__ftp:/ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RoQdN1xrngG7wEPSC6AqHesQtzGvBMP82cosyeO0PYZjTGA5JLyFmli4trDqUTY$>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     BESS mailing list
>     BESS@ietf.org
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!RoQdN1xrngG7wEPSC6AqHesQtzGvBMP82cosyeO0PYZjTGA5JLyFmli4YoTqkAc$>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess
>
-- 

<http://www.verizon.com/>

*Gyan Mishra*

*Network Solutions A**rchitect *

*Email gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com <gyan.s.mis...@verizon.com>*



*M 301 502-1347*
_______________________________________________
BESS mailing list
BESS@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess

Reply via email to