telnet/ssh web interface

2002-08-27 Thread David T-G
Hi, folks -- Has anyone seen or written some code that will talk to a shell or ssh socket on one side and a web page on the other? I'd like to build a web ssh script for those times when I have nothing but a web browser available and want to get to my shell. This seems quite complex but nonethe

Re: Telnet

2001-06-21 Thread Dave Young
$.02 US (fully refundable) --Dave On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, SAWMaster wrote: > Yes and no. You cannot do it with telnet, but you can get what you want by > using an x-term client and setting up the server box to allow x connections. > One commercial example of an X-Term client for a win

Re: Telnet

2001-06-20 Thread Joel Divekar
Thanks Brett Will surely download CygWin32... anyway I wanted to install it for Perl Regards Joel At 10:44 AM 6/20/2001 -0400, Brett W. McCoy wrote: >On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, SAWMaster wrote: > > > Yes and no. You cannot do it with telnet, but you can get what you want by > &g

Re: Telnet

2001-06-20 Thread Joel Divekar
Thanks SAWMaster (Not your real name I suppose) Will surely give it a try but I am looking for a free software Regards Joel At 09:25 AM 6/20/2001 -0500, SAWMaster wrote: >Yes and no. You cannot do it with telnet, but you can get what you want by >using an x-term client and setting

Re: Telnet

2001-06-20 Thread Joel Divekar
Thanks Derek Regards Joel At 03:01 PM 6/20/2001 +0100, Derek Harding wrote: >On Saturday 16 June 2001 07:28, Joel Divekar wrote: > > Hi > > > > Hey can we run KDE or Xwindows by telneting to Linux servers ??? > > > > Regards > >Not by telnet but certainly

Telnet

2001-06-20 Thread Grierson, Garry (UK07)
5 PM > To: Crowder, Rod; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fco. Javier > Valladolid Hdez.; Sally; Joel Divekar > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Telnet > > Yes and no. You cannot do it with telnet, but you can get what you want > by > using an x-term client

Re: Telnet

2001-06-20 Thread Brett W. McCoy
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, SAWMaster wrote: > Yes and no. You cannot do it with telnet, but you can get what you want by > using an x-term client and setting up the server box to allow x connections. > One commercial example of an X-Term client for a windows box would be > X-Win32. Do

Re: Telnet

2001-06-20 Thread SAWMaster
Yes and no. You cannot do it with telnet, but you can get what you want by using an x-term client and setting up the server box to allow x connections. One commercial example of an X-Term client for a windows box would be X-Win32. Do a search on the net for "X-Win32" and you'll

Re: Telnet

2001-06-20 Thread n6tadam
Hi, Of course, you could also run ssh (secure shell). This is more secure than telnet. On the server, make sure that the process "sshd" is running, thus: ps aux | grep sshd HTH, Thomas Adam, a student (in the VIth form) Linux Co-ordinator for The Purbeck School (Network Suppor

Re: Telnet

2001-06-20 Thread Derek Harding
On Saturday 16 June 2001 07:28, Joel Divekar wrote: > Hi > > Hey can we run KDE or Xwindows by telneting to Linux servers ??? > > Regards Not by telnet but certainly it is possible to run "dumb" terminals onto a Linux server (Linux Terminal Server Project) so that 486/2

RE: Telnet

2001-06-20 Thread Joel Divekar
Hi Hey can we run KDE or Xwindows by telneting to Linux servers ??? Regards Joel At 03:26 PM 6/15/2001 +0100, Crowder, Rod wrote: >telnet is not defunct, but is a very basic connection. Normally, connecting >to a unix or other multi-user system, you will have to login/logon with a >

RE: Telnet

2001-06-15 Thread Crowder, Rod
telnet is not defunct, but is a very basic connection. Normally, connecting to a unix or other multi-user system, you will have to login/logon with a name and password in reply to prompts. Usually it comes with a built in terminal emulator, mostly ansi or vt100, you can get other flavours like

Re: Telnet

2001-06-14 Thread Mel Matsuoka
At 02:38 PM 06/14/2001 -0400, Brett W. McCoy wrote: >On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Mel Matsuoka wrote: > >> IMO, telnet *should* be considered "defunct", except when using it for >> debugging and diagnostic purposes (i.e. telnetting directly to service >> ports). If you (

Re: Telnet

2001-06-14 Thread Brett W. McCoy
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Mel Matsuoka wrote: > IMO, telnet *should* be considered "defunct", except when using it for > debugging and diagnostic purposes (i.e. telnetting directly to service > ports). If you (or your server admin) aren't using SSH, it's about hig

Re: Telnet

2001-06-14 Thread Mel Matsuoka
At 01:59 PM 06/14/2001 -0400, Brett W. McCoy wrote: > >PuTTY is another decent Telent/SSH client, and provides a lot of decent >xterm functionality, including mouse clipbaord support. > Let me chime in to endorse PuTTY as well. It's a fantastic, fast and free (with no strings

Re: Telnet

2001-06-14 Thread Brett W. McCoy
's also an extension that allows ssh sessions. > > this application is much better than the standard telnet that comes with > windows. PuTTY is another decent Telent/SSH client, and provides a lot of decent xterm functionality, including mouse clipbaord support.

RE: Telnet

2001-06-14 Thread Brett W. McCoy
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Sally wrote: > Are you assuming I'm running from unix? I'm not I run on windows Telnet has been available on Windows since Windows 95, and you can do these exact same things of things. -- Brett http://www.chapelperil

Re: Telnet

2001-06-14 Thread fliptop
ions. this application is much better than the standard telnet that comes with windows.

RE: Telnet

2001-06-14 Thread Wilson, Tom
You can run telnet from a DOS prompt by entering telnet on the command line. Regards, Tom Wilson -Original Message- From: Sally [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 11:51 AM To: Timothy Kimball; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Telnet Are you assuming I'm ru

RE: Telnet

2001-06-14 Thread Timothy Kimball
Sally wrote: : Are you assuming I'm running from unix? I'm not I run on windows I just tried it under Windows 2000 and it worked for me. -- tdk

RE: Telnet

2001-06-14 Thread Sally
Are you assuming I'm running from unix? I'm not I run on windows -Original Message- From: Timothy Kimball [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 14 June 2001 16:46 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Telnet Derek Harding wrote: : ... I'm not : sure that telnet is defunct, tho

Re: Telnet

2001-06-14 Thread Timothy Kimball
Derek Harding wrote: : ... I'm not : sure that telnet is defunct, though. Is it? No, it's not. "Defunct" means it no longer exists. Telnet is very definitely alive and well. Though it is insecure for general communications, since it talks directly to any port, it's ver

Re: Telnet

2001-06-14 Thread Derek Harding
What Javier says is very true about using ssh but if something happens to lock up at the remote computer it can be hard to get out with ssh without resorting to killing processes whereas, if the network is secure from peeking, one can end a telnet session with the "Ctrl-]" combinatio

Re: Telnet

2001-06-14 Thread Jean-Marc Y. Imbert
s things confusing. For some people (larry??) ftp is even a verb. Now just some information to telnet. Some web servers are also telnet servers, that accepts sessions from telnet clients (ie your machine). to open a session, just enter at your command promt: "telnet " (without the quot

Re: Telnet

2001-06-14 Thread Jean-Marc Y. Imbert
Hi Sally Telnet is a tcp/ip based terminal emulation program. You can open a session on remote hosts and perform actions directly as would you sit in front of the machine working with a console window. Ftp (file transfer protocol) is just one of the dozens of protocols that exist in the tcp/ip

Telnet

2001-06-14 Thread Sally
I've seen lots of references to telnet, but I can't find an explanation of what it actually is. Is it similar to FTP?