On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Rajnikant
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to start one perl script at system boot up time. I'm using HP UX
> 11 and I did standard procedure to start process at start up
> (http://strc.comet.ucar.edu/unix/textfiles/startboot.htm standard process)
les K. Clarkson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Charlie davis'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 06, 2004 6:41 PM
Subject: RE: starting perl
> Charlie davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please stop t
Charlie davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please stop top-posting.
: From: "Charles K. Clarkson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:
: >
: > The server shouldn't matter. Are you using some flavor
: > of Windows? The example was for Windows.
: >
: > Apache is not installed in the ActiveState Perl for
:
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 11:57 PM
Subject: RE: starting perl
> Charlie davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please don't top-post
>
> Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> :
> : > Charlie davis <[EMA
Charlie davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please don't top-post
Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:
: > Charlie davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > :
: > : What I was going by is a line of code in a book called
: > : teacher yourself perl in 24 days. and all the book
: > : said was to type in t
ld be.
When I installed the perl program it also installed the Apache program
- Original Message -
From: "Charles K. Clarkson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Charlie davis'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004
Charlie davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:
: What I was going by is a line of code in a book called
: teacher yourself perl in 24 days. and all the book
: said was to type in that line of code
: c:\perl\bin\perl -w -e "print \"Hello, World!\n\";"
: just like that into the command line. Is this wro
quot; just like that into the
command line. Is this wrong?
- Original Message -
From: "Ned Cunningham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Charlie davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, May 05, 2004 11:38 AM
Subject: RE: starting perl
You have started a new thread?
You should click reply all, and continue on with the same email in the future.
I'm not sure if you are responding to whom? :-)
Also, if one of the "Guru's" reads the second starting of the thread, he/she will not
know what you are asking.
The starting point of y
It works
Type in path at the prompt
Look in it and make sure c:\perl\bin\ is in it ?
If it isn't go to my computer and environment and add it.
HTH
Ned Cunningham
POS Systems Development
Monro Muffler Brake
200 Holleder Parkway
Rochester, NY 14615
(585) 647-6400 ext. 310
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"T
I am a beginner here with learning perl. I have downloaded a perl
program that also came with apache and the installer to install t hem.
But when I try and run the hello world program in dos it dose not work.
I am getting an error that it could not be found.
anyone have any idea what I could ha
On Sunday 02 May 2004 19:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Just some background on my list...Those modules listed on my
> signature
To be a valid signature it must begin with the string "-- \n" so
technically there is no signature in your postings. :-)
John
--
use Perl;
program
fulfillment
-
>Hi William and all,
Hi
>
>> Most Useful Perl Modules
>> -strict
>> -warnings
>why is it everyone keeps suggesting use warnings when you could use
>diagnostics and get a whole lot of more info?
>I'd go for the diagnostics instead of the warnings module. Does this
>have any negative side effects
You need to add perl to your %PATH% or give it an explicite path name such as
c:\> \perl\bin\perl -w -e "print \ "Hello, World!\n\";"
JW
Charlie davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From what I can remember I am running MSDOS version 6.0 (I thank) and the version of
>perl is perl 5.8
But w
Stephan Hochhaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:
: why is it everyone keeps suggesting use warnings when you
: could use diagnostics and get a whole lot of more info?
: I'd go for the diagnostics instead of the warnings module.
: Does this have any negative side effects (besides working
: towards the
Hi William and all,
Most Useful Perl Modules
-strict
-warnings
why is it everyone keeps suggesting use warnings when you could use
diagnostics and get a whole lot of more info?
I'd go for the diagnostics instead of the warnings module. Does this
have any negative side effects (besides working to
In a message dated 5/2/2004 9:08:37 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>I am a beginner here with learning perl. I have downloaded a perl program
that also came
>with apache and the installer to install t hem. But when I try and run the
hello world
>program in dos it dose not
> "R" == R Joseph Newton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
R> I totally forgot, by the time I got to addressing .pm, that
R> extensions in any context could be other than Evil in Randal's
R> universe.
See, I never ever said that. Odd how I would get misheard on this
point.
Extensions for *comma
On Sunday, Nov 16, 2003, at 13:19 US/Pacific, R. Joseph Newton wrote:
Rob Dixon wrote:
Joseph wrote:
I don't mind it for source files, but having to type "foo.pl" to run
the "foo" command strikes me as excessive user hostility.
..and so does double-clicking on the script icon?
Which, to be fair, do
"R. Joseph Newton" wrote:
> "Randal L. Schwartz" wrote:
>
> > Rob> Perl modules are in *.pm.
>
> > Yes, this is enforced by Perl.
>
> ... Perl does use the extension
> system for identifying modules under Windows. It looks specifically for files
> with the .pm extension.
>
> I just checked. ..
Rob Dixon wrote:
> Joseph wrote:
> >
> > > I don't mind it for source files, but having to type "foo.pl" to run
> > > the "foo" command strikes me as excessive user hostility.
> >
> > ..and so does double-clicking on the script icon?
>
> Which, to be fair, doesn't allow any command-line parameters
On Saturday, Nov 15, 2003, at 23:38 US/Pacific, R. Joseph Newton wrote:
[..]
The most recent comment seems to be about the organizational process
involved with keeping files sorted by category. It is a fairly
straightforward issue. It seemed a very cogent point. Nothing in
the origin of the thre
Joseph wrote:
>
> > I don't mind it for source files, but having to type "foo.pl" to run
> > the "foo" command strikes me as excessive user hostility.
>
> ..and so does double-clicking on the script icon?
Which, to be fair, doesn't allow any command-line parameters apart
from those that you though
"Randal L. Schwartz" wrote:
> I don't mind it for source files, but having to type "foo.pl" to run
> the "foo" command strikes me as excessive user hostility.
..and so does double-clicking on the script icon?
Joseph
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
drieux wrote:
>
> Which Organizational Process
>
The one here on Earth, specifically the one a beginner to Perl, and probably also to
programming, faces in taking his first steps to learning the language. This was the
subject of the original post, from a user who stated that he opera
"Randal L. Schwartz" wrote:
> > "Rob" == Rob Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Rob> Perl programs conventionally go in *.pl files.
>
> No. Only on broken architectures that demand it (read: "windows").
Oh?
Greetings! E:\d_drive\ocf\discuss\prototype>perl mailparse
> "Bob" == Bob X <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Bob> So, by your comment, I can take it to mean that the book can now
Bob> cover both *nix and Windows and that you have either told the
Bob> Windows people to use .pl or .plx correct?
Yes, I seem to recall that is what we did. We spent a lot of w
"Randal L. Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > "Chris" == McMahon, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Chris> You *are* the one who wrote "Learning Perl on Win32 Systems", yes?
>
> I wrote the "Learning Perl" parts yes. Eric Olsen (I'm probably
> manglin
On Friday, Nov 14, 2003, at 08:06 US/Pacific, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
[..]
Luckily, with the modern Learning Perl book, there's no need for a
separate version. O'Reilly continues to sell it though, simply
because it's selling. :) We've come a long way from that first series
of books.
[..]
For t
Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
>
> > "Rob" == Rob Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Rob> Perl programs conventionally go in *.pl files.
>
> No. Only on broken architectures that demand it (read: "windows").
> On Unix, Perl programs have no extension, any more than "cat" has an
> extension. Why
> "Chris" == McMahon, Chris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chris> You *are* the one who wrote "Learning Perl on Win32 Systems", yes?
I wrote the "Learning Perl" parts yes. Eric Olsen (I'm probably
mangling the spelling of his name) wrote the Win32 parts though. I
didn't even know the book was
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 8:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Starting Perl
>>>>> "Chris" == Chris McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chris> I name my Perl scripts on my FreeBSD box "
> "Chris" == Chris McMahon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chris> I name my Perl scripts on my FreeBSD box "something.pl"
Chris> because I'm the first (and so far only, but not for long) user
Chris> of a Unix-y system in an all-Windows shop, and I don't want my
Chris> colleagues to be confused.
> "Chuk" == Chuk Goodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Chuk> Sort of both, but more of the former. Basically, if I've got a
Chuk> directory sitting there with three or four different types of
Chuk> files in it, I'd like to know which ones are perl (and I can
Chuk> just open them up in vi and fix
On Thursday, Nov 13, 2003, at 12:29 US/Pacific, Chuk Goodin wrote:
[..]
While that would indeed be the Best Practice, as a beginner just
learning,
one of the things I like about perl are the differences from other
(usually compiled) languages that I'm used to.
[..]
Chuk, et al,
a part of the rea
On Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 11:33:14AM -0800, drieux wrote:
> So let us step back and look at the 'root cause problem'
>
> so I want to just 'fix it on the fly'
>
> and yes, foo.pl as an editable text file will allow you
> simply open it with a text editor and WHACK a fix in. Unlike
> RealCode[
On Thursday, Nov 13, 2003, at 10:34 US/Pacific, Chuk Goodin wrote:
[..]
Basically, if I've got a directory
sitting there with three or four different types of files in it, I'd
like
to know which ones are perl (and I can just open them up in vi and fix
them) and which ones aren't (and I'll have to
> >What kind of naming structure would you suggest for people who just
> >want
> >to use extensions for organizational purposes?
>
> when you say for 'organizational purposes' do you
> mean in terms of tracking the 'source code' in a
> source code control system? Or do you mean tracking
> named a
On Thursday, Nov 13, 2003, at 09:32 US/Pacific, Chuk Goodin wrote:
[..]
What kind of naming structure would you suggest for people who just
want
to use extensions for organizational purposes?
[..]
when you say for 'organizational purposes' do you
mean in terms of tracking the 'source code' in a
On Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 07:55:24PM -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
> Rob> Perl programs conventionally go in *.pl files.
>
> No. Only on broken architectures that demand it (read: "windows").
> On Unix, Perl programs have no extension, any more than "cat" has an
> extension. Why should the user
On Thursday, Nov 13, 2003, at 07:49 US/Pacific, McMahon, Chris wrote:
[..]
I name my Perl scripts on my FreeBSD box "something.pl" because
I'm the first (and so far only, but not for long) user of a Unix-y
system in an all-Windows shop, and I don't want my colleagues to be
confused. Quizzic
Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2003 8:55 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Starting Perl
>>>>> "Rob" == Rob Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> Perl programs conventionally go in *.pl
> "Rob" == Rob Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Rob> Perl programs conventionally go in *.pl files.
No. Only on broken architectures that demand it (read: "windows").
On Unix, Perl programs have no extension, any more than "cat" has an
extension. Why should the user care what the implement
Dan Anderson wrote:
>
> Perl code takes the form of a text file. If you're under windows you'll
> name your perl files with the .pm extension.
Hi Dan.
Perl programs conventionally go in *.pl files. Perl modules
are in *.pm.
Rob
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional com
> i'd like to say first that i'm using activePerl ,
> under windows.
> for O'Reilly, i couldn't subscribe or even have the 14
> days trial because i don't have a credit card.. :(
> I have a question, because really i couldn't help
> myself...
You're probably either going to need to pick up a book
On Tuesday, Nov 11, 2003, at 04:08 US/Pacific, yomna el-tawil wrote:
[..]
But I've got some problems,
i'd like to say first that i'm using activePerl ,
under windows.
remember everyone started some place.
for O'Reilly, i couldn't subscribe or even have the 14
days trial because i don't have a cred
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:25:03PM -, Rob Dixon wrote:
> Yomna el-Tawil wrote:
>>
>> for O'Reilly, i couldn't subscribe or even have the 14
>> days trial because i don't have a credit card.. :(
>
> I'm not sure what you mean here. O'Reilly is a book publisher
> who publishes, amongst other thi
yomna el-tawil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] asked:
> i'd like to say first that i'm using activePerl ,
> under windows.
If you've installed that properly, you're set.
> for O'Reilly, i couldn't subscribe or even have the 14
> days trial because i don't have a credit card.. :(
> I have a question, b
Notepad, emacs, vi, word with save as text only, anywhere you can write
text. That is saved as text with no special formatting.
-Original Message-
From: yomna el-tawil [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 7:09 AM
To: Beginners Perl
Subject: Starting Perl
Thank you
Yomna el-Tawil wrote:
>
> Thank you all for ur answeres...
>
> But I've got some problems, i'd like to say first that i'm
> using activePerl, under windows.
>
> for O'Reilly, i couldn't subscribe or even have the 14
> days trial because i don't have a credit card.. :(
I'm not sure what you mean he
50 matches
Mail list logo
